OhioMillersburg

Majora Lane Ctr for Rehab & Nsg Care INC

105 Majora Lane, Millersburg, OH 44654 · Holmes County · 80 certified beds · avg 60 residents/day · certified since Aug 16, 1984

Part of chain: ALTERCARE (22 facilities, chain avg rating 3.3★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.38
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jun 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Apr 4, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 8, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jul 29, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jul 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Jul 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint
Jul 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Jul 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Jul 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Sep 26, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jun 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202310D
202460F
202560E
2026130F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOhio avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.383.453.95top 45% in Ohio; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.650.600.69top 32% in Ohio; top 42% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.823.073.50bottom 39% in Ohio; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.390.420.48top 49% in Ohio; bottom 50% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)52.248.745.8bottom 39% in Ohio; bottom 31% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.343.942.9top 31% in Ohio; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.56, RN 0.68, weekend 2.96. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Individual

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Gerald F Schroer Dynasty Tr Ua 12312009 Fbo Andrew M SchroerOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/15/2015
Gerald F Schroer Dynasty Tr Ua 12312009 Fbo Gerald F Schroer JrOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/15/2015
Gerald F Schroer Dynasty Tr Ua 12312009 Fbo Matthew SchroerOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/15/2015
Gerald F Schroer Dynasty Tr Ua 12312009 Margaret S GoodmanOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/15/2015
Susanne Schroer Dynasty Trust U/AOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/15/2015
The Schroer Group, INC.Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2003
TSG Nursing Centers, INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/2003
Altercare of Ohio, INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2003
Film, GeorgeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
Goodman, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/15/2003
Logan, JustinIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Mock, DouglasIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE09/20/2021
Mock, DouglasIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/20/2021
Mock, DouglasIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/20/2021
Nutter, OrianIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2021
Tikkanen, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/30/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Scenic Pointe Nursing and Rehab Ctr2.2 miMillersburg, OH★★★★★4/5
Sycamore Run Nursing and Rehab Ctr2.8 miMillersburg, OH★★★★☆4/5
Walnut Hills Nursing Home10.3 miWalnut Creek, OH★★★★☆3/5
Oak Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation13.1 miBaltic, OH★★★★★5/5
Wayne County Care Center16.8 miWooster, OH★★★★★4/5
Roscoe Gardens Skilled Nursing and Rehab18.8 miCoshocton, OH★★☆☆☆1/5
Glendora Health Care Center19.1 miWooster, OH★☆☆☆☆1/5
West View Healthy Living19.2 miWooster, OH★★★★☆4/5
Wooster Community Hospital SNF19.2 miWooster, OH★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Millersburg →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365632.