IllinoisDes Plaines

Lee Manor

1301 Lee Street, Des Plaines, IL 60018 · Cook County · 262 certified beds · avg 207 residents/day · certified since Jun 4, 1979

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.71
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 18, 2025 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 19, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 18, 2025 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 19, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 18, 2025 · F-0692

The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.

Why it matters: Malnutrition and dehydration can quickly weaken a resident and lead to serious complications.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 19, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (15)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 27, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Apr 18, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 18, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Apr 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Apr 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Apr 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Apr 18, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Nov 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Mar 22, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Apr 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Apr 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202350D
202420E
202573G ▲
202610E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 18, 2025Payment Denial29 days from May 11, 2025

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIllinois avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.712.993.95top 47% in Illinois; bottom 6% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.780.630.69top 23% in Illinois; top 29% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.432.673.50top 47% in Illinois; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.680.560.48top 26% in Illinois; top 17% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)27.744.545.8top 12% in Illinois; top 11% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)26.841.842.9top 26% in Illinois; top 24% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.10, RN 0.89, weekend 2.78. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Dorothy Vangel QSS TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest68%10/19/2007
Dorothy Vangel QSS TrustOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/19/2007
Gabrys, AllanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2016
McNiff, WilliamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/16/2005
Meyers, ElizabethIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE03/08/2003
Vangel, ChristopherIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Elevate Care Des Plaines0.6 miDes Plaines, IL★★★☆☆3/5
Alden Des Plaines Rehab & HC1.7 miDes Plaines, IL★★★★☆4/5
Ascension Nazarethville Place1.9 miDes Plaines, IL★★★★★5/5
Rivaya Care of Des Plaines2.1 miDes Plaines, IL★☆☆☆☆2/5
Asbury Court Nursing & Rehab2.4 miDes Plaines, IL★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Avantara Park Ridge2.6 miPark Ridge, IL★★★★☆4/5
Park Ridge Healthcare Center2.6 miPark Ridge, IL★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Harmony Park Ridge2.7 miPark Ridge, IL★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Niles Nsg & Rehab Ctr3.4 miNiles, IL★★★★★5/5
Elevate Care Niles3.5 miNiles, IL★★★☆☆3/5
Elevate Care Abington3.7 miGlenview, IL★★★★☆4/5
Eden Vista Prospect Heights4.3 miProspect Heights, IL★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Des Plaines →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 145382.