Lee Manor
1301 Lee Street, Des Plaines, IL 60018 · Cook County · 262 certified beds · avg 207 residents/day · certified since Jun 4, 1979
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 18, 2025 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Apr 19, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 18, 2025 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Apr 19, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 18, 2025 · F-0692
The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Why it matters: Malnutrition and dehydration can quickly weaken a resident and lead to serious complications.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Apr 19, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (15)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint |
| Apr 18, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Apr 18, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Apr 18, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| Apr 18, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. |
| Apr 18, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. |
| Apr 18, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. |
| Apr 18, 2025 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. |
| Nov 19, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint |
| Mar 22, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Sep 11, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Apr 26, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Apr 26, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. |
| Apr 26, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Apr 26, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 7).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 7 | 3 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2025 | Payment Denial | 29 days from May 11, 2025 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Illinois avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.71 | 2.99 | 3.95 | top 47% in Illinois; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.78 | 0.63 | 0.69 | top 23% in Illinois; top 29% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.43 | 2.67 | 3.50 | top 47% in Illinois; bottom 7% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.68 | 0.56 | 0.48 | top 26% in Illinois; top 17% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 27.7 | 44.5 | 45.8 | top 12% in Illinois; top 11% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 26.8 | 41.8 | 42.9 | top 26% in Illinois; top 24% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.10, RN 0.89, weekend 2.78. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dorothy Vangel QSS Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 68% | 10/19/2007 |
| Dorothy Vangel QSS Trust | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/19/2007 |
| Gabrys, Allan | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
| McNiff, William | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/16/2005 |
| Meyers, Elizabeth | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/08/2003 |
| Vangel, Christopher | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
- "How do you arrange eye and hearing care for residents, including appointments and equipment like glasses or hearing aids?"
- "What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
- "Where do you post your daily staffing numbers, and can I see today's?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elevate Care Des Plaines | 0.6 mi | Des Plaines, IL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Alden Des Plaines Rehab & HC | 1.7 mi | Des Plaines, IL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Ascension Nazarethville Place | 1.9 mi | Des Plaines, IL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Rivaya Care of Des Plaines | 2.1 mi | Des Plaines, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Asbury Court Nursing & Rehab | 2.4 mi | Des Plaines, IL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Avantara Park Ridge | 2.6 mi | Park Ridge, IL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Park Ridge Healthcare Center | 2.6 mi | Park Ridge, IL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Harmony Park Ridge | 2.7 mi | Park Ridge, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Niles Nsg & Rehab Ctr | 3.4 mi | Niles, IL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Elevate Care Niles | 3.5 mi | Niles, IL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Elevate Care Abington | 3.7 mi | Glenview, IL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Eden Vista Prospect Heights | 4.3 mi | Prospect Heights, IL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Des Plaines →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 145382.