How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
2000 Cambridge Drive, Davidsville, PA 15928 (opens Google Maps) · Somerset County · (814) 288-2724· 60 certified beds · avg 57 residents/day · certified since Feb 22, 1993 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: FRIENDS SERVICES FOR THE AGING (5 facilities, chain avg rating 4.6★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. F-0842
The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. F-0605
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605 |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals. · F-0810 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 7).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 7 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.97 | 3.94 | 3.95 | top 14% in Pennsylvania; top 14% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.91 | 0.80 | 0.69 | top 25% in Pennsylvania; top 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.27 | 3.58 | 3.50 | top 18% in Pennsylvania; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.48 | top 33% in Pennsylvania; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 54.1 | 44.5 | 45.8 | bottom 24% in Pennsylvania; bottom 27% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 33.3 | 39.9 | 42.9 | top 37% in Pennsylvania; top 33% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.04, RN 0.92, weekend 4.33.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.04 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Laurel View Village. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Church related
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allegheny Christian Ministries, INC. | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/19/1983 |
| Baxter, Gerald | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Borkow, Mary | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Clark, Jodi | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Hoffman, Christopher | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Lester, Blaine | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/25/2023 |
| McGee, David | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2019 |
| Sawyer, Mark | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2019 |
| Shoemaker, Charles | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2011 |
| Speigle, Harlan | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/14/2025 |
| Thomas, Barry | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2011 |
| Vizzini, James | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2024 |
| Allegheny Christian Ministries, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/19/1983 |
| Baker Tilly Us LLP | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/27/2022 |
| Baker Tilly Us LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/18/2025 |
| Baxter, Gerald | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Baxter, Gerald | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Baxter, Gerald | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Benchmark Therapies, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2020 |
| Benchmark Therapies, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/18/2025 |
Showing 20 of 80 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 60 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Friends Services for the Aging — 5 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concordia at Arbutus Park | 2.7 mi | Johnstown, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Windber Woods Senior Living & Rehabilitation Ctr | 3.2 mi | Windber, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Quality Life Services - Westmont | 4.3 mi | Johnstown, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Richland Nursing and Rehab | 4.3 mi | Johnstown, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Heritage Ridge Senior Living at Johnstown | 4.4 mi | Johnstown, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center Tcu | 5.2 mi | Johnstown, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Hilltop Heights Health & Rehab Center | 5.4 mi | Johnstown, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation, LLC | 15.0 mi | Portage, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Somerset Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center | 17.1 mi | Somerset, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Bethlen HM of the Hungarian RF of America | 17.4 mi | Ligonier, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Patriot Village | 19.3 mi | Somerset, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Maple Heights Health & Rehab Center, LLC | 19.7 mi | Ebensburg, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Somerset, PA — 6 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395891.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details