TexasSan Antonio

Lakeside Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

8707 Lakeside Parkway, San Antonio, TX 78245 · Bexar County · 118 certified beds · avg 112 residents/day · certified since Oct 12, 2012

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$14,611
Fines, last 3 years
3.05
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Feb 16, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Feb 6, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Feb 16, 2024 · F-0607 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.

Why it matters: Without working prevention policies, mistreatment is more likely to happen and less likely to be caught.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Feb 6, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Feb 16, 2024 · F-0609 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.

Why it matters: When incidents aren't reported promptly, abusers may continue harming residents and outside authorities can't step in.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Feb 6, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jun 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jul 31, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 31, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Jul 31, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jul 31, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand.
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Feb 16, 2024▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 16, 2024▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Feb 16, 2024▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Sep 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role. · from a complaint
Apr 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 26, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not provide a neutral and fair arbitration process. Arbitration is a way of settling disputes outside of court, and if it's used, the facility must agree with the resident on a neutral arbitrator and a convenient location.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202350D
2024123K ▲
202540E
202620D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $14,611.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 16, 2024Fine$14,611

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.053.463.95bottom 26% in Texas; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.450.440.69top 35% in Texas; bottom 29% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.463.043.50bottom 13% in Texas; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.490.340.48top 15% in Texas; top 34% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)36.855.345.8top 15% in Texas; top 28% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)30.854.642.9top 19% in Texas; top 30% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.33, RN 0.49, weekend 2.69. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Government - Hospital district

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Alonzo, CarlosIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2022
Alonzo, CarlosIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2022
Alonzo, CarlosIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2022
Atique, RashidIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2024
Atique, RashidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2024
Atique, RashidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2024
Burnam, SoonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/03/2021
Crystal Lake Healthcare, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2022
Crystal Lake Healthcare, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/16/2025
Keetch, ChadIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2011
The Ensign Group INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/03/2021
Thompson, JohnnyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/16/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Westover Hills Rehabilitation and Healthcare1.8 miSan Antonio, TX★★★★☆3/5
Windemere at Westover Hills2.0 miSan Antonio, TX★★☆☆☆3/5
Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - West S2.3 miSan Antonio, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Las Colinas of Westover2.8 miSan Antonio, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
The Mission at Blue Skies of Texas East3.5 miSan Antonio, TX★★★★★4/5
Silver Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation3.7 miSan Antonio, TX★★★☆☆4/5
Inspiration Hills Rehabilitation Center5.6 miSan Antonio, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Mystic Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center6.3 miSan Antonio, TX★★★☆☆2/5
Mesa Vista Inn Health Center6.5 miSan Antonio, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Avir at San Knoll6.5 miSan Antonio, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Harbor Valley Health and Rehabilitation6.5 miSan Antonio, TX★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Huebner Creek Health & Rehabilitation Center6.7 miSan Antonio, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in San Antonio →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676325.