Katherine and Charles Hover Green Houses

Name: Katherine and Charles Hover Green Houses
Address: 1425 BELMONT DR, Longmont, CO, 80503, US
Telephone: 3037729292

1425 Belmont Dr, Longmont, CO 80503 · Boulder County · 48 certified beds · avg 43 residents/day · certified since Dec 12, 2019

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$42,262

Fines, last 3 years

5.89

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 29, 2026 · F-0688

The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.

Why it matters: Without this care, residents can develop stiff, contracted joints and lose the ability to move on their own.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 26, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 29, 2026 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 26, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (13)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jan 29, 2026	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jan 29, 2026	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 29, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 29, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service.
Jan 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility charged residents' personal funds for items or services that Medicare or Medicaid already pays for. Facilities may not bill residents for covered items.
Jan 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Feb 6, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Nov 8, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not make sure care was delivered by qualified people following each resident's written care plan — the individualized document that spells out exactly what care that resident is supposed to receive. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not verify that its nurse aides had completed their required training, or did not retrain aides who had been out of nurse aide work for 2 years. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation. · from a complaint
Oct 27, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Oct 27, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 6).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2022	2	0	D
2023	4	0	E
2024	1	0	D
2026	6	2	G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

6 fines totaling $42,262.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Jan 29, 2026	Fine	$20,150
Jan 2, 2024	Fine	$3,846
Dec 11, 2023	Fine	$9,527
Nov 20, 2023	Fine	$2,447
Nov 13, 2023	Fine	$2,098
Oct 23, 2023	Fine	$4,194

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Colorado avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	5.89	3.89	3.95	top 4% in Colorado; top 5% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	1.27	0.86	0.69	top 12% in Colorado; top 8% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	5.57	3.44	3.50	top 2% in Colorado; top 3% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.88	0.61	0.48	top 14% in Colorado; top 9% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	53.9	47.1	45.8	bottom 29% in Colorado; bottom 27% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	30.8	44.6	42.9	top 22% in Colorado; top 30% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.23, RN 1.13, weekend 4.95. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Czolowski, Lisa	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	02/11/2016
Katherine and Charles Hover Green Houses INC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	02/11/2016
Lange, Roger	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	02/11/2016
Raymer, Holly	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	09/04/2018
Roggow, Robert	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	02/11/2016
Schluntz, Larry	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	02/11/2016
Scrimshire, Judy	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	02/11/2016

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What do you do daily to keep residents moving, and how do you help residents at risk of losing mobility?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"How is your kitchen staffed, and have meals ever been delayed because of staffing?"
"Can you give me a written list of exactly what residents are charged for beyond what Medicare or Medicaid covers?"
"How often do you evaluate your nurse aides and what ongoing training do they receive?"
"If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
"What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
McIntosh Care and Rehabilitation Center	0.5 mi	Longmont, CO	★★★☆☆	3/5
Peaks Care Center, the	1.6 mi	Longmont, CO	★★★☆☆	3/5
Life Care Center of Longmont	1.7 mi	Longmont, CO	★★★☆☆	2/5
Accel at Longmont Health and Rehab, LLC	3.4 mi	Longmont, CO	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuseSFF
Berthoud Care and Rehabilitation	8.9 mi	Berthoud, CO	★★★★☆	4/5
Winding Trails Post Acute	11.8 mi	Boulder, CO	★★☆☆☆	1/5
Good Samaritan - Loveland Village	13.2 mi	Loveland, CO	★★★☆☆	2/5	abuse
Boulder Post Acute	13.2 mi	Boulder, CO	★★★★☆	3/5
Boulder Canyon Health and Rehabilitation	13.9 mi	Boulder, CO	★★★★☆	4/5
Frasier Meadows Health Care Center	14.0 mi	Boulder, CO	★★★★★	4/5
Green House Homes at Mirasol, the	14.5 mi	Loveland, CO	★★★★★	4/5
Coal Creek Post Acute & Assisted Living	14.7 mi	Lafayette, CO	★★★★☆	3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Longmont →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 065432.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Katherine and Charles Hover Green Houses

1425 Belmont Dr, Longmont, CO 80503 · 3037729292

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $42,262

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Jan 29, 2026 (F-0688, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
▲ Jan 29, 2026 (F-0689, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What do you do daily to keep residents moving, and how do you help residents at risk of losing mobility?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "How is your kitchen staffed, and have meals ever been delayed because of staffing?"
☐ "Can you give me a written list of exactly what residents are charged for beyond what Medicare or Medicaid covers?"
☐ "How often do you evaluate your nurse aides and what ongoing training do they receive?"
☐ "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
☐ "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 065432 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)