MississippiUnion

J G Alexander Nursing Center

25112 Highway 15, Union, MS 39365 · Newton County · 60 certified beds · avg 56 residents/day · certified since Mar 20, 2006

Part of chain: THE BEEBE FAMILY (48 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$10,868
Fines, last 3 years
5.19
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 30, 2025 · F-0580

The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.

Why it matters: A family could learn about a serious injury or decline days later, after the chance to act has passed.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 22, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 30, 2025 · F-0692

The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.

Why it matters: Malnutrition and dehydration can quickly weaken a resident and lead to serious complications.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 22, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 30, 2025 · F-0758

The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.

Why it matters: Unneeded psychiatric medications can leave residents overly sedated and raise the risk of falls and other serious harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 22, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 30, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Apr 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 30, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Jan 30, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jan 30, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jan 30, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.
Jan 30, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Aug 3, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Aug 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202350F
202593G ▲
202620F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $10,868.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jan 30, 2025Fine$5,434
Jan 30, 2025Fine$5,434

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMississippi avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.194.883.95top 30% in Mississippi; top 11% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.040.740.69top 12% in Mississippi; top 14% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.754.093.50bottom 39% in Mississippi; top 31% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.420.380.48top 26% in Mississippi; top 45% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)48.145.745.8bottom 42% in Mississippi; bottom 42% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)12.538.442.9top 11% in Mississippi; top 6% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.37, RN 0.87, weekend 3.16. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Individual

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Delaney, StevenIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%05/01/2009
Pace, GarryIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%05/01/2009
Belenchia, RussellIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2009
Delaney, StevenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2009
Eubanks, TonyaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2009
Eubanks, TonyaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2009
Pace, GarryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2009
Pace, GarryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2009
Pace, StephenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2009
Pace, StephenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2009
Shelton, RebeccaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2014

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Hilltop Manor Health and Rehabilitation Center2.2 miUnion, MS★★★☆☆3/5
Neshoba County Nursing Home14.4 miPhiladelphia, MS★★★☆☆2/5
Choctaw Residential Center15.8 miChoctaw, MS★★☆☆☆2/5
Bedford Care Center of Newton16.9 miNewton, MS★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Union →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 255318.