How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
33600 West 85th Street, De Soto, KS 66018 (opens Google Maps) · Johnson County · (913) 583-1266· 49 certified beds · avg 44 residents/day · certified since Nov 28, 2003 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. F-0868
The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). F-0628
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 7, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868 |
| Jan 7, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| Jan 7, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jan 7, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 20, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730 |
| Feb 20, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 20, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · F-0947 |
| Feb 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Feb 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Aug 2, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 2, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · F-0565 |
| Aug 2, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Aug 2, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Aug 2, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Aug 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Aug 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 8 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Kansas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.70 | 4.58 | 3.95 | bottom 24% in Kansas; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.58 | 0.81 | 0.69 | bottom 29% in Kansas; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.36 | 4.05 | 3.50 | bottom 29% in Kansas; top 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.78 | 0.49 | 0.48 | top 13% in Kansas; top 12% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 45.2 | 48.1 | 45.8 | top 44% in Kansas; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 25.0 | 42.0 | 42.9 | top 24% in Kansas; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.79, RN 0.60, weekend 3.45.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.79 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Hillside Village of de Soto Rehabilitation and Nur. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gateway Healthcare LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/26/2024 |
| Abbot Health Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2024 |
| Burnam, Soon | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/26/2024 |
| Dean, Ethan | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/13/2024 |
| Dean, Ethan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/13/2024 |
| Dean, Ethan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/09/2026 |
| Ensign Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2024 |
| Jorgensen, David | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/26/2024 |
| Keetch, Chad | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/26/2024 |
| Lee, Jessica | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2024 |
| Lee, Jessica | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2024 |
| Lee, Jessica | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/09/2026 |
| Port, Barry | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/09/2026 |
| Standard Bearer Healthcare Op LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2024 |
| The Ensign Group INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2024 |
All 15 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Ensign Group — 342 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 341 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicalodges Eudora | 7.2 mi | Eudora, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Bonner Springs Nursing & Rehab Center | 8.1 mi | Bonner Springs, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Evergreen Community of Johnson County | 8.4 mi | Olathe, KS | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Kaw River Care and Rehab | 10.3 mi | Edwardsville, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Parkway Operator LLC | 10.3 mi | Edwardsville, KS | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Edwardsville Care and Rehab | 10.3 mi | Edwardsville, KS | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Tonganoxie Terrace | 10.5 mi | Tonganoxie, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Aberdeen Village | 10.8 mi | Olathe, KS | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Azria Health Olathe | 11.3 mi | Olathe, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| The Healthcare Resort of Olathe | 11.3 mi | Olathe, KS | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital | 11.5 mi | Gardner, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Good Samaritan-Olathe | 11.6 mi | Olathe, KS | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Johnson, KS — 35 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175472.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details