695 Mitzi Street, North Muskegon, MI 49445 (opens Google Maps) · Muskegon County · (231) 744-1641· 39 certified beds · avg 36 residents/day · certified since Aug 1, 1992 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ATRIUM CENTERS (26 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 28, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 24, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 11, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 3, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. F-0658
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Dec 4, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 4, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Mar 28, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Oct 16, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 16, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Oct 16, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Oct 16, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 11, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Mar 11, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · from a complaint · F-0679 |
| Oct 3, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Oct 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Oct 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Oct 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Oct 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Oct 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Oct 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 6 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 5 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2024 | Payment Denial | 34 days from Apr 4, 2024 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Michigan avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.86 | 4.32 | 3.95 | bottom 31% in Michigan; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.59 | 0.84 | 0.69 | bottom 28% in Michigan; top 50% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.45 | 3.79 | 3.50 | bottom 38% in Michigan; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.27 | 0.49 | 0.48 | bottom 22% in Michigan; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 52.0 | 44.1 | 45.8 | bottom 25% in Michigan; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 42.9 | 39.2 | 42.9 | bottom 43% in Michigan; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.59, RN 0.55, weekend 3.22.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.59 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Hillcrest Nursing and Rehabilitation Community. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrium Centers, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 10/01/2007 |
| Albright Ross, Susan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2018 |
| Albright Ross, Susan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2018 |
| Amicus Capital Holdings INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/18/2021 |
| Amicus Capital Holdings, INC. Employee Stock Ownership Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/18/2021 |
| Amicus Properties LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Anderson, Curt | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2025 |
| Anderson, Curt | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2025 |
| Atrium Centers Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Bailey, Essel | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2007 |
| Broad River Rehabilitation | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Cherry, Jill | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| Cherry, Jill | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| Finney, Donald | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2003 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2023 |
| Johnson, Cindy | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/18/2024 |
| Johnson, Cindy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/18/2024 |
| Johnson, Cindy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/18/2024 |
| Kramer, Tina | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/26/2025 |
| Kramer, Tina | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/26/2025 |
Showing 20 of 37 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 17 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Atrium Centers — 26 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 25 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harbor Terrace Senior Living | 2.6 mi | Muskegon, MI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Lake Woods Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 3.8 mi | Muskegon, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of Muskegon | 4.1 mi | Muskegon, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Roosevelt Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Communit | 4.9 mi | Muskegon, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Christian Care Nursing Center | 5.0 mi | Muskegon, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of Whitehall | 9.8 mi | Whitehall, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Heartwood Lodge Trinity Health | 12.3 mi | Spring Lake, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Riverside Nursing Centre | 14.9 mi | Grand Haven, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Medilodge at the Shore | 15.1 mi | Grand Haven, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235522.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details