MichiganNorth Muskegon

Hillcrest Nursing and Rehabilitation Community

695 Mitzi Street, North Muskegon, MI 49445 · Muskegon County · 39 certified beds · avg 36 residents/day · certified since Aug 1, 1992

Part of chain: ATRIUM CENTERS (26 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.86
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 28, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 24, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 11, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 3, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Dec 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Mar 28, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Oct 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 11, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · from a complaint
Oct 3, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Oct 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Oct 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Oct 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Oct 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202370F
202461G ▲
202551G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 11, 2024Payment Denial34 days from Apr 4, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMichigan avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.864.323.95bottom 31% in Michigan; top 46% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.590.840.69bottom 28% in Michigan; top 50% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.453.793.50bottom 38% in Michigan; top 44% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.270.490.48bottom 22% in Michigan; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)52.044.145.8bottom 25% in Michigan; bottom 32% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)42.939.242.9bottom 43% in Michigan; bottom 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.59, RN 0.55, weekend 3.22. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Atrium Centers, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%10/01/2007
Albright Ross, SusanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2018
Albright Ross, SusanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2018
Amicus Capital Holdings INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/18/2021
Amicus Capital Holdings, INC. Employee Stock Ownership TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/18/2021
Amicus Properties LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Anderson, CurtIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025
Anderson, CurtIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025
Atrium Centers Management LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2007
Bailey, EsselIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2007
Broad River RehabilitationOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2021
Cherry, JillIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Cherry, JillIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Finney, DonaldIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2003
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
Johnson, CindyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/18/2024
Johnson, CindyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/18/2024
Johnson, CindyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/18/2024
Kramer, TinaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/26/2025
Kramer, TinaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/26/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Harbor Terrace Senior Living2.6 miMuskegon, MI★★★★★4/5
Lake Woods Nursing & Rehabilitation Center3.8 miMuskegon, MI★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of Muskegon4.1 miMuskegon, MI★★☆☆☆2/5
Roosevelt Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Communit4.9 miMuskegon, MI★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Christian Care Nursing Center5.0 miMuskegon, MI★★☆☆☆2/5
Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of Whitehall9.8 miWhitehall, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Heartwood Lodge Trinity Health12.3 miSpring Lake, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Riverside Nursing Centre14.9 miGrand Haven, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Medilodge at the Shore15.1 miGrand Haven, MI★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in North Muskegon →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235522.