TexasSeguin

Avir at Walnut Springs

1637 N King St, Seguin, TX 78155 · Guadalupe County · 113 certified beds · avg 68 residents/day · certified since Dec 10, 1996

Part of chain: AVIR HEALTH GROUP (116 facilities, chain avg rating 2.3★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.69
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (14)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Nov 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Nov 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely.
Nov 18, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
May 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Aug 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Aug 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 28, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. · from a complaint
Jun 16, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202310B
202450D
202580E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.693.463.95top 25% in Texas; bottom 46% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.170.440.69bottom 5% in Texas; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.963.043.50top 44% in Texas; bottom 29% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.190.340.48bottom 19% in Texas; bottom 11% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)57.755.345.8bottom 37% in Texas; bottom 20% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.054.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.66, RN 0.17, weekend 2.94. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Fannin County Hospital AuthorityOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%09/01/2020
1637 N King St Opco, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025
1637 N King St Opco, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025
Dagan, AmitaiIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/20/2025
Freund, NochumIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025
Goldberger, AbrahamIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/20/2025
Goldberger, FaigyIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/20/2025
Kuo, Yu JieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025
Kuo, Yu JieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025
Sanderson, ClarkIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/29/2012
Travitsky, AaronIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025
Welltower NNN Group, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025
Welltower Op, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025
Zuniga, JudithIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Avir at Seguin1.3 miSeguin, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Guadalupe Valley Nursing and Rehabilitation Center1.5 miSeguin, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Segui1.5 miSeguin, TX★★☆☆☆3/5
River Bend Healthcare1.6 miSeguin, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - New Br11.6 miNew Braunfels, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Avir at New Braunfels12.1 miNew Braunfels, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Sundance Inn Health Center13.4 miNew Braunfels, TX★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Eden Home14.3 miNew Braunfels, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Kirkwood Manor14.5 miNew Braunfels, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Cypress Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center18.1 miSan Marcos, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Avir at Luling18.5 miLuling, TX★★☆☆☆1/5
Silver Tree Nursing and Rehabilitation Center18.6 miSchertz, TX★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Seguin →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675656.