620 Grandview Ave, Blair, WI 54616 (opens Google Maps) · Trempealeau County · (608) 989-2511· 50 certified beds · avg 46 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1997 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Feb 25, 2025 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 21, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 25, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 21, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 24 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. F-0690
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. F-0697
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Apr 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Apr 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Apr 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Apr 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 25, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Feb 25, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Feb 25, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not give all staff the required training on its quality improvement program — the internal system for finding problems and making care better. · from a complaint · F-0944 |
| Feb 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Feb 25, 2025 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a compliance and ethics program — an internal system designed to prevent and catch violations of the law and ethical standards. · from a complaint · F-0895 |
| Feb 25, 2025 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not provide its staff with training in compliance and ethics — teaching employees the laws and ethical standards that govern how residents must be treated. · from a complaint · F-0946 |
| Jan 24, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jan 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Jan 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jan 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Jan 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 24, 2024 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Nov 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Nov 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Nov 30, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 30, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Nov 30, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Nov 30, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 11 | 2 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $59,085, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2025 | Fine | $59,085 |
| Feb 25, 2025 | Payment Denial | 6 days from Mar 15, 2025 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Wisconsin avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.32 | 4.29 | 3.95 | top 41% in Wisconsin; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.80 | 1.01 | 0.69 | bottom 33% in Wisconsin; top 27% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.69 | 3.84 | 3.50 | top 49% in Wisconsin; top 34% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.47 | 0.68 | 0.48 | bottom 28% in Wisconsin; top 36% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 56.1 | 46.9 | 45.8 | bottom 25% in Wisconsin; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 39.7 | 42.9 | bottom 36% in Wisconsin; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.30, RN 0.80, weekend 3.67.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.30 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Grand View Care Ctr. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grand View Home INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/01/1966 |
| Bautch, Doris | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2020 |
| Blaha, Geraldine | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/21/2023 |
| Blaha, Geraldine | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/16/2024 |
| Gonyo, Thomas | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/18/2009 |
| Grand View Home INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1966 |
| Grand View Home INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/05/2025 |
| Klomps-Mcclung, Megan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Klomps-Mcclung, Megan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Lunsford, Chalsie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/28/2022 |
| Lunsford, Chalsie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/28/2022 |
| Moen, Rodney | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/15/2012 |
| Simmons, Sheila | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/21/2023 |
| Simmons, Sheila | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/16/2024 |
| Steele, Leah | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/09/2023 |
| Steele, Leah | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/09/2023 |
| Steele, Leah | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/09/2023 |
| Syverson, Paul | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2025 |
| Vehrenkamp, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Vehrenkamp, John | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
Showing 20 of 23 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 3 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trempealeau Cty HCC Imd | 6.7 mi | Whitehall, WI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Pigeon Falls HCC | 9.2 mi | Pigeon Falls, WI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Marinuka Manor | 14.7 mi | Galesville, WI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Meadowbrook at Black River Falls | 18.4 mi | Black River Falls, WI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Pine View Care Center | 18.6 mi | Black River Falls, WI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Trempealeau, WI — 5 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 525624.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details