WisconsinBlair

Grand View Care Ctr

620 Grandview Ave, Blair, WI 54616 · Trempealeau County · 50 certified beds · avg 46 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1997

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$59,085
Fines, last 3 years
4.32
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 25, 2025 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 21, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 25, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 21, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Apr 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Apr 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Apr 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 25, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Feb 25, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 25, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not give all staff the required training on its quality improvement program — the internal system for finding problems and making care better. · from a complaint
Feb 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Feb 25, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not have a compliance and ethics program — an internal system designed to prevent and catch violations of the law and ethical standards. · from a complaint
Feb 25, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not provide its staff with training in compliance and ethics — teaching employees the laws and ethical standards that govern how residents must be treated. · from a complaint
Jan 24, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Jan 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jan 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 24, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Nov 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Nov 30, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 30, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Nov 30, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Nov 30, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202240E
202320D
202470F
2025112J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $59,085, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 25, 2025Fine$59,085
Feb 25, 2025Payment Denial6 days from Mar 15, 2025

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityWisconsin avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.324.293.95top 41% in Wisconsin; top 28% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.801.010.69bottom 33% in Wisconsin; top 27% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.693.843.50top 49% in Wisconsin; top 34% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.470.680.48bottom 28% in Wisconsin; top 36% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)56.146.945.8bottom 25% in Wisconsin; bottom 23% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.039.742.9bottom 36% in Wisconsin; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.30, RN 0.80, weekend 3.67. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Grand View Home INC.Organization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/1966
Bautch, DorisIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Blaha, GeraldineIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/21/2023
Blaha, GeraldineIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/16/2024
Gonyo, ThomasIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/18/2009
Grand View Home INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1966
Grand View Home INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/05/2025
Klomps-Mcclung, MeganIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Klomps-Mcclung, MeganIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Lunsford, ChalsieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/28/2022
Lunsford, ChalsieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/28/2022
Moen, RodneyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/15/2012
Simmons, SheilaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/21/2023
Simmons, SheilaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/16/2024
Steele, LeahIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/09/2023
Steele, LeahIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/09/2023
Steele, LeahIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/09/2023
Syverson, PaulIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/19/2025
Vehrenkamp, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Vehrenkamp, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Trempealeau Cty HCC Imd6.6 miWhitehall, WI★★★★★5/5
Pigeon Falls HCC9.2 miPigeon Falls, WI★★★★★4/5
Marinuka Manor14.7 miGalesville, WI★★★★★5/5
Meadowbrook at Black River Falls18.4 miBlack River Falls, WI★☆☆☆☆2/5
Pine View Care Center18.6 miBlack River Falls, WI★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Blair →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 525624.