Grace Pointe Cont Care Sr Campus, Skilled Nursing

1919 68th Ave, Greeley, CO 80634 (opens Google Maps) · Weld County · (970) 304-1919· 53 certified beds · avg 48 residents/day · certified since Nov 30, 2009 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified

Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected Feb 26, 2026

Serious findings on record

most recent Oct 22, 2025

Fines, last 3 years

4.91

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 22, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Nov 13, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

Feb 26, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
Oct 22, 2025G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689

View all 11 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Feb 26, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Feb 26, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Oct 22, 2025	▲ G · Actual harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Nov 16, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561
Nov 16, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Aug 11, 2022	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Aug 11, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Aug 11, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677
Aug 11, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692
Aug 11, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697
Aug 11, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (2 → 2).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2022

2023

2025

2026

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2022	6	0	F
2023	2	0	D
2025	1	1	G ▲
2026	2	0	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityColorado averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

4.91

3.89

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

1.13

0.86

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

4.33

3.44

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	Colorado avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.91	3.89	3.95	top 12% in Colorado; top 15% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	1.13	0.86	0.69	top 18% in Colorado; top 11% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.33	3.44	3.50	top 13% in Colorado; top 15% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.85	0.61	0.48	top 16% in Colorado; top 10% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	42.3	47.1	45.8	top 34% in Colorado; top 42% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	31.6	44.6	42.9	top 27% in Colorado; top 32% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.69, RN 1.08, weekend 4.14.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.69 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Grace Pointe Cont Care Sr Campus, Skilled Nursing. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Individual

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Briscoe, Stephen	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	20%	08/01/2021
Mountain States Health Properties, LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	09/14/2005
WGCC, LLC	Organization	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	06/18/2008
Anderson, Shareen	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/15/2018
Anderson, Shareen	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/15/2018
Briscoe, Stephen	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	09/14/2005
Briscoe, Stephen	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	11/14/2009
Briscoe, Stephen	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/08/2025
Briscoe, Stephen	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2009
Continuum Health Management LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/11/1995
Kadari, Rajendra	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/14/2009
WGCC, LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	09/14/2005
WGCC, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/18/2008

All 13 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"What choices do residents have over their daily schedule, like meal times, bathing, and activities?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
"How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
"How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 42% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"The ownership record on file lists 13 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 20 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Center at Centerplace, LLC, the	1.6 mi	Greeley, CO	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Life Care Center of Greeley	1.8 mi	Greeley, CO	★★★★★	4/5
Westlake Health and Rehabilitation Center	3.2 mi	Greeley, CO	★★★★☆	4/5
Broadview Health and Rehabilitation Center	3.9 mi	Greeley, CO	★★★★☆	4/5
Fairacres Manor, INC.	4.2 mi	Greeley, CO	★★★★☆	4/5
Pelican Pointe Health and Rehabilitation Center	7.3 mi	Windsor, CO	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Columbine Commons Health and Rehab LLC	8.9 mi	Windsor, CO	★★★★★	5/5
Green House Homes at Mirasol, the	14.3 mi	Loveland, CO	★★★★★	4/5
Good Samaritan - Loveland Village	15.5 mi	Loveland, CO	★★★☆☆	2/5	abuse
Riverbend Health and Rehabilitation Center	15.8 mi	Loveland, CO	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Lemay Avenue Health and Rehab LLC	16.2 mi	Fort Collins, CO	★★★★☆	4/5
North Shore Health & Rehab Facility	16.3 mi	Loveland, CO	★★★★☆	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Greeley →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 065397.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

The Care File

Visit checklist — Grace Pointe Cont Care Sr Campus, Skilled Nursing

1919 68th Ave, Greeley, CO 80634 · (970) 304-1919

Health inspection rating 4/5 · CMS overall 5/5· Fines (3y): $0

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Oct 22, 2025 (F-0689, Actual harm, isolated): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "What choices do residents have over their daily schedule, like meal times, bathing, and activities?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
☐ "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
☐ "How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
☐ "CMS reports 42% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
☐ "The ownership record on file lists 13 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
☐ "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 065397 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)