North CarolinaLouisburg

Franklin Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

1704 Nc Highway 39 N, Louisburg, NC 27549 · Franklin County · 166 certified beds · avg 145 residents/day · certified since Nov 2, 1990

Part of chain: PRINCIPLE LONG TERM CARE (40 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.68
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 12, 2023 · F-0550

The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.

Why it matters: Being treated without dignity harms a resident's self-worth, mental health, and overall quality of life.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 14, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 8, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
May 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
May 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Apr 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Apr 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Apr 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 12, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jan 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's bedrooms did not give residents visual privacy — such as curtains or dividers — when privacy is needed.
Jan 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Jan 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202351G ▲
2024100E
202530F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNorth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.684.013.95top 49% in North Carolina; bottom 46% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.380.640.69bottom 22% in North Carolina; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.533.563.50top 34% in North Carolina; top 40% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.240.410.48bottom 30% in North Carolina; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)28.649.045.8top 8% in North Carolina; top 12% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)23.145.742.9top 16% in North Carolina; top 18% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.39, RN 0.35, weekend 3.25. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Boice, GaleIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/05/2018
Bullock, LynnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/07/2011
Bullock, LynnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/10/2025
Hill, RaymondIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011
Hill, RobertIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011
Hill, StephenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011
Johnson, DianneIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011
Principle Long Term Care, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011
Principle Long Term Care, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/10/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Louisburg Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center1.7 miLouisburg, NC★☆☆☆☆2/5
Hillside Nursing Center of Wake Forest13.7 miWake Forest, NC★★★★★5/5
Kerr Lake Nursing and Rehabilitation Center17.4 miHenderson, NC★★★★☆4/5
Senior Citizens Home17.4 miHenderson, NC★☆☆☆☆3/5
Camellia Gardens Center for Nursing and Rehab18.3 miHenderson, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5
Zebulon Rehabilitation Center18.6 miZebulon, NC★★★★☆4/5
Perry Creek Health and Rehabilitation Center19.9 miRaleigh, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Louisburg →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345335.