28910 Plymouth Road, Livonia, MI 48150 (opens Google Maps) · Wayne County · (734) 425-4814· 108 certified beds · avg 98 residents/day · certified since Dec 11, 1998 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION (36 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 3, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 15, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Sep 4, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 12, 2023 · F-0684
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 1, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Sep 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Sep 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Aug 15, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Aug 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Aug 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657 |
| Aug 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint · F-0919 |
| Jun 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Jun 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Jul 12, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jul 12, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 12, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Jul 12, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. · F-0809 |
| Jul 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jul 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 6 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 4 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $8,985.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2024 | Fine | $8,985 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Michigan avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.61 | 4.32 | 3.95 | bottom 15% in Michigan; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.55 | 0.84 | 0.69 | bottom 24% in Michigan; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.17 | 3.79 | 3.50 | bottom 15% in Michigan; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.43 | 0.49 | 0.48 | top 50% in Michigan; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 48.5 | 44.1 | 45.8 | bottom 35% in Michigan; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 30.0 | 39.2 | 42.9 | top 32% in Michigan; top 29% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.69, RN 0.57, weekend 3.24.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.69 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Fountain Bleu Health and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dunn, Charles | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 50% | 01/01/2020 |
| Patel, Pinal | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 25% | 01/01/2020 |
| Shah, Nayana | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 25% | 01/01/2020 |
| Cassidy, Bruce | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Cassidy, Bruce | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/19/2025 |
| Cervi-Jonski, Laura | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/21/2019 |
| Cervi-Jonski, Laura | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/03/2025 |
| Cliftonlarsonallen LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Conner, Marianne | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Dunn, Charles | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2018 |
| Hemant Shah 2018 Irrevocable Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2018 |
| McFaddin, Maria | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2015 |
| Metro Man IV LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2018 |
| Optum Management Solutions. INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/03/2025 |
| Paar 108 LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2018 |
| Patel, Rajan | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2018 |
| Patel, Rajan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2018 |
| Pinal R. Patel 2017 Irrevocable Trust F/B/O Aarna R. Patel | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2018 |
| Pinal R. Patel 2017 Irrevocable Trust F/B/O Ansh R. Patel | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2018 |
| Pinal R. Patel 2020 Irrevocable Family Trust Uad 10-6-2020 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2018 |
Showing 20 of 27 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 7 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Optalis Health & Rehabilitation — 36 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 35 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Four Chaplains Nursing Care Center | 1.1 mi | Westland, MI | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Regency at Livonia | 1.7 mi | Livonia, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Majestic Care of Livonia | 2.7 mi | Livonia, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Dearborn Heig | 3.4 mi | Dearborn Heights, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Orchards at Redford | 4.0 mi | Redford, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Westland, a Villa Center | 4.2 mi | Westland, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Four Seasons Nursing Center of Westland | 4.4 mi | Westland, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Marywood Nursing Care Center | 4.7 mi | Livonia, MI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Medilodge of Livonia | 4.9 mi | Livonia, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Manor of Farmington Hills | 5.2 mi | Farmington Hills, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Regency at Westland | 5.3 mi | Westland, MI | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| West Oaks Senior Care & Rehab Center | 5.4 mi | Detroit, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Wayne, MI — 63 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235587.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details