Folsom Care Center

Name: Folsom Care Center
Address: 510 Mill Street, Folsom, CA, 95630, US
Telephone: 9169853641

510 Mill Street, Folsom, CA 95630 · Sacramento County · 99 certified beds · avg 85 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

4.85

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (34)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Apr 24, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 24, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Apr 24, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Apr 24, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Apr 24, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Apr 24, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 24, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Apr 24, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 24, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 24, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Apr 24, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Apr 24, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Apr 24, 2026	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility had resident rooms holding more people than allowed — no more than 4 residents per room, and no more than 2 per room in buildings constructed after November 28, 2016.
Apr 24, 2026	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Apr 1, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 23, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Nov 25, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 14, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 14, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 14, 2025	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility had resident rooms holding more people than allowed — no more than 4 residents per room, and no more than 2 per room in buildings constructed after November 28, 2016.
Feb 14, 2025	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Mar 28, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
Jan 26, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 26, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 26, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 26, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service.
Jan 26, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Jan 26, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jan 26, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Jan 26, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jan 26, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Jan 26, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Jan 26, 2024	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility had resident rooms holding more people than allowed — no more than 4 residents per room, and no more than 2 per room in buildings constructed after November 28, 2016.
Jan 26, 2024	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 14).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2024	13	F
2025	5	D
2026	16	F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	California avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.85	4.31	3.95	top 18% in California; top 16% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.90	0.61	0.69	top 14% in California; top 21% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.32	3.90	3.50	top 19% in California; top 15% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.55	0.51	0.48	top 26% in California; top 28% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	31.7	36.7	45.8	top 36% in California; top 17% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	33.3	38.1	42.9	top 40% in California; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.67, RN 0.86, weekend 4.16. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Callaway, Calvin	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	50%	10/01/2010
Elmont, Ninel	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	50%	10/01/2010
Bluff Enterprises Corp	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2010
Callaway, Calvin	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2010
Callaway, Calvin	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2010
DVNC Ventures LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Mortgage Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2010
DVNC Ventures LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/15/2026
Elmont, Brett	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2013
Elmont, Brett	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2002
Elmont, Ninel	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2010
Elmont, Ninel	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2010
Gutman, Donald	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/10/1980
Gutman, Donald	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/10/1980
Hamer, Christopher	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
"How often do you evaluate your nurse aides and what ongoing training do they receive?"
"How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
"What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Fair Oaks Healthcare Center	5.1 mi	Fair Oaks, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Citrus Heights Post Acute	6.0 mi	Citrus Heights, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
Roseville Care Center	6.4 mi	Roseville, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5	abuse
Pine Creek Care Center	6.4 mi	Roseville, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Roseville Point Health & Wellness Center	6.7 mi	Roseville, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Oak Ridge Healthcare Center	6.9 mi	Roseville, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
Manzanita Healthcare Center	8.7 mi	Carmichael, CA	★★★★★	3/5
Casa Coloma Health Care Center	9.0 mi	Rancho Cordova, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Sacramento Post-Acute	9.2 mi	Sacramento, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
American River Center	9.7 mi	Carmichael, CA	★★★★☆	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Folsom →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 055173.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Folsom Care Center

510 Mill Street, Folsom, CA 95630 · 9169853641

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
☐ "How often do you evaluate your nurse aides and what ongoing training do they receive?"
☐ "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
☐ "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 055173 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)