TexasMidland

Ashton Medical Lodge

801 South Loop 250 West, Midland, TX 79703 · Midland County · 144 certified beds · avg 132 residents/day · certified since Oct 10, 2017 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$13,397
Fines, last 3 years
2.80
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jan 5, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jan 6, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 10, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
May 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jan 5, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 21, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Dec 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340F
202421J ▲
2025140E
202650E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $13,397.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 21, 2023Fine$13,397

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.803.463.95bottom 11% in Texas; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.320.440.69bottom 33% in Texas; bottom 11% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.473.043.50bottom 14% in Texas; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.350.340.48top 34% in Texas; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)49.655.345.8top 44% in Texas; bottom 38% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)35.754.642.9top 25% in Texas; top 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.39, RN 0.38, weekend 3.00. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Atkins, JeffreyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Bowerman, StephenIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Campbell, JohnIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/06/2026
Campbell, KennethIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/06/2026
David W Miller GS TrustOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
DWM 5x5 TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Fairbrook Partners, LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Foursquare Texas 16 LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Foursquare Texas 16 LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/23/2025
Hampton, BroderickIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Hampton, BroderickIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Jec GS TrustOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Jem 5x5 TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
John E Miller GS TrustOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Kingsbury Capital LLC Series FOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
KJC GS TrustOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Lewis, ShaneIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Lion Plaza LPOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Midland NH Realty LTDOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Miller, DavidIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/06/2026

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Mabee Health Care Center1.6 miMidland, TX★★★★☆3/5
Focused Care at Midland5.0 miMidland, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Midland Medical Lodge5.1 miMidland, TX★★★☆☆4/5
Focused Care at Hogan Park5.9 miMidland, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Parks Health Center9.5 miOdessa, TX★★★★☆4/5
Deerings Nursing and Rehabilitation12.1 miOdessa, TX★★★☆☆4/5
Madison Medical Resort12.3 miOdessa, TX★★☆☆☆3/5
Buena Vida Nursing & Rehab Odessa13.2 miOdessa, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Focused Care at Odessa17.1 miOdessa, TX★★☆☆☆3/5
Sienna Nursing and Rehabilitation17.5 miOdessa, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Midland →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676430.