MichiganFenton

Fenton Healthcare

512 Beach Street, Fenton, MI 48430 · Genesee County · 92 certified beds · avg 67 residents/day · certified since Jan 25, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE (81 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.91
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Oct 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Oct 3, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Oct 3, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Oct 3, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 3, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Oct 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 14, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202390F
202470F
202540F
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMichigan avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.914.323.95bottom 35% in Michigan; top 43% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.020.840.69top 25% in Michigan; top 15% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.393.793.50bottom 33% in Michigan; top 48% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.620.490.48top 24% in Michigan; top 22% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)27.744.145.8top 10% in Michigan; top 11% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)30.839.242.9top 34% in Michigan; top 30% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.45, RN 0.90, weekend 2.99. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Individual

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Mohammad a Qazi Living Trust Dated 09/26/97OrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/21/2025
Qazi, MohammadIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/21/2025
Ciena Healthcare Management INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2018
Ciena Healthcare Management INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/25/2025
Khan, AnisIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2018
Khan, AnisIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2018
Khan, AnisIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2018
Qazi, MohammadIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2018
Qazi, MohammadIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Wellbridge of Fenton1.0 miFenton, MI★★★☆☆3/5
Caretel Inns of Linden3.6 miLinden, MI★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehabilitation Ce4.0 miHolly, MI★★☆☆☆2/5
Wellbridge of Grand Blanc6.8 miGrand Blanc, MI★★★★☆2/5
Argentine Care Center6.8 miLinden, MI★★★★★3/5
The Oaks at Woodfield8.4 miGrand Blanc, MI★★★★☆3/5
Regency at Grand Blanc10.1 miGrand Blanc, MI★★★★★3/5
Medilodge of Grand Blanc10.7 miGrand Blanc, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5
West Hickory Haven14.1 miMilford, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Villa at Beecher Place14.7 miFlint, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Willowbrook Manor14.7 miFlint, MI★★☆☆☆2/5
Medilodge of Milford15.4 miMilford, MI★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Fenton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235482.