IllinoisCanton

Renaissance Care Center

1675 East Ash Street, Canton, IL 61520 · Fulton County · 120 certified beds · avg 56 residents/day · certified since Mar 31, 1994

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
6.37
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 9, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 11, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 11, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 14, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 9, 2022 · F-0697

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jan 5, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 9, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Jan 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Jan 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jun 11, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint
May 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
May 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Nov 16, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.
Nov 16, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Nov 16, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Nov 16, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Nov 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Dec 9, 2022▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Dec 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Dec 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Dec 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Dec 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Dec 9, 2022C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202271G ▲
202370F
202441G ▲
202590F
202611G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIllinois avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)6.372.993.95top 1% in Illinois; top 3% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.730.630.69top 4% in Illinois; top 3% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.842.673.50top 1% in Illinois; top 2% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.500.560.48top 3% in Illinois; top 2% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)26.144.545.8top 10% in Illinois; top 8% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)24.141.842.9top 22% in Illinois; top 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 7.80, RN 2.11, weekend 7.14. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Alter, BethIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2020
Alter, BradleyIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2020
Alter, RaananIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/01/2020
Ashman, GaryIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2005
Beth Alter Spousal TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest19%03/27/2025
Bradley Alter Spousal TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest19%07/01/2020
Geller, RitaIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest03/01/2016
Howard D. Geller Family TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest47%03/27/2025
Alter, BethIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Alter, BradleyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/01/1991
Alter, BradleyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/01/1991
Alter, BradleyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/1991
Alter, BradleyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/1991
Alter, RaananIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/1991
Ashman, GaryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Beth Alter Spousal TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2020
Bradley Alter Spousal TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2020
Howard D. Geller Family TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2025
Jones, MarthaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/14/2012
Jones, MarthaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/14/2012

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Sunset Rehabilitation and Health Care1.5 miCanton, IL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Graham Hospital1.8 miCanton, IL★★★☆☆3/5
Loft Rehab & Nursing of Canton2.7 miCanton, IL★★☆☆☆3/5
Farmington Village Nrsg8.9 miFarmington, IL★★☆☆☆1/5
Clayberg, the10.9 miCuba, IL★★★★★5/5
Arcadia Care Havana17.8 miHavana, IL★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Pekin Manor19.9 miPekin, IL★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Canton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 145793.