MichiganCentreville

Fairview Nursing and Rehabilitation Community

441 E Main St, Centreville, MI 49032 · St. Joseph County · 64 certified beds · avg 46 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967

Part of chain: ATRIUM CENTERS (26 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
5
Serious findings on record
$55,738
Fines, last 3 years
3.88
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Aug 14, 2023 · F-0744 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience.

Why it matters: Poor dementia care can lead to distress, unsafe wandering, or unnecessary sedating medication.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Sep 8, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 8, 2023 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 6, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 14, 2023 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 8, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 14, 2023 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 8, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 14, 2023 · F-0949 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide its staff with required training on behavioral health — caring for residents with conditions like dementia, depression, or other mental health needs.

Why it matters: Untrained staff may respond poorly to residents with dementia or mental health needs, causing distress or harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 8, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Jul 24, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jul 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Jul 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Aug 8, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Aug 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Aug 14, 2023▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · from a complaint
Aug 14, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 14, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Aug 14, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide its staff with required training on behavioral health — caring for residents with conditions like dementia, depression, or other mental health needs. · from a complaint
Aug 14, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Aug 14, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop, carry out, or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
Aug 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to receive the visitors they choose, at the times they choose.
Aug 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Aug 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Aug 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023135K ▲
202450E
202550E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $55,738.

DateTypeAmount / length
Nov 8, 2023Fine$55,738

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMichigan avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.884.323.95bottom 32% in Michigan; top 45% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.730.840.69bottom 47% in Michigan; top 33% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.393.793.50bottom 33% in Michigan; top 48% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.300.490.48bottom 27% in Michigan; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)30.244.145.8top 15% in Michigan; top 14% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)28.639.242.9top 29% in Michigan; top 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.13, RN 0.59, weekend 2.74. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Atrium Centers, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%10/01/2007
Bailey, EsselIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest74%12/27/2012
Finney, DonaldIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest25%08/22/2012
Albright Ross, SusanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2018
Albright Ross, SusanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2018
Atrium Centers Management LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2007
Bailey, EsselIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2007
Ferkany, JamesIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2018
Ferkany, JamesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2018
Finney, DonaldIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/22/2012
Fite, NathanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/04/2016
Lockhart, DennisIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Three Rivers6.4 miThree Rivers, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
The Orchards at Three Rivers7.6 miThree Rivers, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Froh Community Home10.4 miSturgis, MI★★★☆☆3/5
Life Care Center of Lagrange19.5 miLagrange, IN★★★★★4/5
Medilodge of Portage19.6 miPortage, MI★★★☆☆2/5
Waters of Lagrange Skilled Nursing Facility, the19.6 miLagrange, IN★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Centreville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235013.