CaliforniaEncino

Encino Hospital Medical Center D/P SNF

16237 Ventura Blvd, Encino, CA 91436 · Los Angeles County · 28 certified beds · avg 24 residents/day · certified since Jun 28, 1989

Part of chain: PRIME HEALTHCARE (6 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.44
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Dec 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Dec 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Mar 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident or their legal representative see or buy copies of the resident's own records. · from a complaint
Mar 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role. · from a complaint
Jan 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Jan 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Sep 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202310D
2024190E
202540E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.444.313.95bottom 8% in California; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.980.610.69top 11% in California; top 16% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.183.903.50bottom 10% in California; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)2.490.510.48top 2% in California; top 1% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)32.736.745.8top 39% in California; top 19% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)7.738.142.9top 4% in California; top 3% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 7.62, RN 2.18, weekend 7.03. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Prime Healthcare Foundation INCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%01/01/2010
Prime Healthcare Services - Encino LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%06/01/2008
Bhatia, SundeepIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Doan, ChristopherIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
Garcia, EmIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Garcia, EmIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Garcia, EmIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Sherman Oaks Health & Rehab2.3 miSherman Oaks, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Sherman Oaks Hospital SNF DP2.3 miSherman Oaks, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Berkley Post-Acute2.6 miVan Nuys, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Lake Balboa Care Center2.6 miVan Nuys, CA★★★★☆3/5
California Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center2.7 miVan Nuys, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Tarzana Health and Rehabilitation Center3.1 miTarzana, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Eisenberg Village3.5 miReseda, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Terrace Post Acute3.6 miVan Nuys, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Care Center on Hazeltine, LLC3.9 miVan Nuys, CA★★★★☆3/5
Park View Nursing and Subacute4.1 miReseda, CA★★☆☆☆1/5
Valley Village Care Center4.5 miNorth Hollywood, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Joyce Eisenberg Keefer Medical Center D/P SNF4.5 miReseda, CA★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Encino →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555380.