MinnesotaNorth Branch

Ecumen North Branch

5379 -383rd Street, North Branch, MN 55056 · Chisago County · 50 certified beds · avg 45 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1986

Part of chain: ECUMEN (5 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.97
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (14)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jul 24, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 24, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 24, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Aug 9, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Aug 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Aug 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Aug 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Aug 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Aug 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · from a complaint
Sep 27, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330E
202480F
202530F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.974.833.95top 41% in Minnesota; top 14% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.081.220.69bottom 46% in Minnesota; top 13% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.414.273.50top 41% in Minnesota; top 14% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.620.690.48top 47% in Minnesota; top 22% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)62.742.245.8bottom 9% in Minnesota; bottom 13% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.338.642.9top 45% in Minnesota; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.51, RN 0.98, weekend 4.01. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
EcumenOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest01/01/1988
Bjerketvedt, ScottIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE02/25/2020
Bjerketvedt, ScottIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/25/2020
Bjerketvedt, ScottIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/25/2020
Crockett, SusanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2021
Dady, JamesIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2019
Kendrick, ShelleyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/04/2019
Kendrick, ShelleyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/04/2019
Petraborg, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2020
Ulvestad, NancyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Parmly on the Lake LLC11.7 miChisago City, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
The Estates at Rush City LLC12.4 miRush City, MN★★☆☆☆3/5
Meadows on Fairview12.8 miWyoming, MN★★★★☆5/5
Gracepointe Crossing Gables12.8 miCambridge, MN★★★★★3/5
Birchwood Health Care Center15.2 miForest Lake, MN★★☆☆☆1/5
Dove Healthcare - St Croix Falls18.8 miSt Croix Falls, WI★☆☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in North Branch →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245370.