NebraskaColumbus

Emerald Nursing & Rehab Columbus

2855 40th Avenue, Columbus, NE 68601 · Platte County · 145 certified beds · avg 74 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1989

Part of chain: EMERALD HEALTHCARE (14 facilities, chain avg rating 1.3★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.15
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 29, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Apr 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Apr 29, 2026C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint
Aug 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Aug 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Aug 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jul 18, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jul 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Jul 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
May 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
May 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Oct 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Aug 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340D
2024120F
202520E
202640E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Aug 21, 2025Payment Denial21 days from Nov 21, 2025

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNebraska avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.154.333.95bottom 6% in Nebraska; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.350.720.69bottom 7% in Nebraska; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.863.793.50bottom 8% in Nebraska; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.280.470.48bottom 20% in Nebraska; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)60.948.745.8bottom 27% in Nebraska; bottom 15% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.344.142.9top 36% in Nebraska; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.57, RN 0.39, weekend 3.24. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Chafetz, YisroelIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2023
JW Nebraska Operations, LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2023
Reisman, AdinaIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2023
Segal, CarynIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2023
Walden, JacobIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2023
Bank of OklahomaOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2022
Bank of OklahomaOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/24/2025
Chafetz, YisroelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2023
Chafetz, YisroelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2023
Emerald Healthcare LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2019
Emerald Healthcare LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/22/2025
Evolve Therapy Services LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2019
Evolve Therapy Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/22/2025
Fleischmann, DavidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Fleischmann, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Goff, KileyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2024
Goff, KileyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2024
Gopin, BrianIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2023
Gopin, BrianIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Gronenthal, MeganIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/19/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Brookestone Acres0.7 miColumbus, NE★★★★★5/5
St. Joseph's Villa, INC.18.3 miDavid City, NE★★☆☆☆2/5
Genoa Community Hospital/Ltc18.3 miGenoa, NE★★☆☆☆3/5
Brookestone of David City19.0 miDavid City, NE★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Columbus →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 285092.