IowaSergeant Bluff

Embassy Rehab and Care Center

206 Port Neal Road, Sergeant Bluff, IA 51054 · Woodbury County · 60 certified beds · avg 44 residents/day · certified since Nov 28, 1988

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: LANTIS ENTERPRISES (5 facilities, chain avg rating 1.6★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.15
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 21, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
May 21, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
May 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience.
May 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Oct 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jun 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Jun 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Jun 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Jun 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Jun 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jun 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jun 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience.
Jun 20, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Jun 20, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Jun 20, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. · from a complaint
Jun 20, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jun 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jun 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Jun 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jan 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jan 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jan 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024110F
2025110E
202650E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIowa avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.154.373.95bottom 45% in Iowa; top 34% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.900.850.69top 36% in Iowa; top 20% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.383.863.50bottom 27% in Iowa; top 48% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.600.510.48top 26% in Iowa; top 23% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)54.244.045.8bottom 23% in Iowa; bottom 27% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)25.042.142.9top 27% in Iowa; top 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.51, RN 0.77, weekend 2.87. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Kismet HD LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Kismet Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Lantis, CammyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Lantis, MaryIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Lantis, TravisIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Rinard, SandraIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Soulek, WendyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Jennings, MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Jennings, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Lantis Enterprises, INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Lantis, CammyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Lantis, CammyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Lantis, MaryIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Lantis, MaryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Lantis, MaryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Moerman, BillijeanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/16/2023
Moerman, BillijeanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/16/2023
Moore, MichaelIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Moore, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Rinard, SandraIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Pioneer Valley Living and Rehab0.5 miSergeant Bluff, IA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Continental Falls5.0 miSouth Sioux City, NE★★☆☆☆2/5
Adept Nursing & Rehab of South Sioux City5.2 miSouth Sioux City, NE★☆☆☆☆2/5
Sunrise Retirement Community5.5 miSioux City, IA★★★★★4/5
St Luke's Regional Medical Center SNF7.2 miSioux City, IA★★★★★5/5
Casa de Paz Health Care Center8.8 miSioux City, IA★★☆☆☆2/5
Holy Spirit Retirement Home9.1 miSioux City, IA★★★☆☆2/5
Westwood Specialty Care9.3 miSioux City, IA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Accura Healthcare of Sioux City, LLC9.7 miSioux City, IA★★★★☆4/5
Carl T Curtis Health Education Center Nursing Home19.1 miMacy, NE★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Sergeant Bluff →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 165145.