IowaRed Oak

Red Oak Rehab and Care Center

1600 Summit Street, Red Oak, IA 51566 · Montgomery County · 58 certified beds · avg 29 residents/day · certified since Aug 18, 1993

Part of chain: LANTIS ENTERPRISES (5 facilities, chain avg rating 1.6★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.65
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 20, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 1, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 13, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 1, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint
Jun 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint
Jun 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Jun 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Sep 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Oct 24, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Oct 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jul 20, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 13, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jun 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Jun 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Feb 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Feb 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · from a complaint
Jul 19, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 19, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Jul 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Jul 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Jul 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jul 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Jul 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202380F
2024102G ▲
202520D
202640D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jun 13, 2024Payment Denial23 days from Jul 9, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIowa avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.654.373.95top 33% in Iowa; top 19% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.010.850.69top 27% in Iowa; top 15% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.493.863.50top 16% in Iowa; top 12% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.860.510.48top 8% in Iowa; top 9% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)44.844.045.8bottom 43% in Iowa; top 50% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)40.042.142.9top 47% in Iowa; top 46% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.54, RN 0.77, weekend 3.41. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Kismet HD LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Kismet Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Lantis, CammyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Lantis, MaryIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Lantis, TravisIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Rinard, SandraIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Soulek, WendyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Donoso Pena, DanielaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Donoso Pena, DanielaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Lantis Enterprises, INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Lantis, CammyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Lantis, CammyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Lantis, MaryIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Lantis, MaryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Lantis, MaryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Moore, MichaelIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Moore, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Rinard, SandraIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2018
Runyan, CherylIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/08/2022
Runyan, CherylIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/08/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Good Samaritan - Red Oak0.9 miRed Oak, IA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Accura Healthcare of Stanton6.5 miStanton, IA★★★☆☆3/5
Good Samaritan - Villisca13.4 miVillisca, IA★★★☆☆2/5
Accura Healthcare of Shenandoah19.9 miShenandoah, IA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Garden View Care Center19.9 miShenandoah, IA—/5abuseSFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Red Oak →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 165185.