South CarolinaUnion

Ellen Sagar Nursing Center

1817 Jonesville Highway, Union, SC 29379 · Union County · 113 certified beds · avg 100 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.87
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 4, 2021 · F-0656

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 4, 2021 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 4, 2021 · F-0688

The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.

Why it matters: Without this care, residents can develop stiff, contracted joints and lose the ability to move on their own.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 4, 2021 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (13)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 4, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Aug 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Jun 4, 2021▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 4, 2021▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jun 4, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jun 4, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Jun 4, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202152G ▲
202320E
202560E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilitySouth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.874.083.95bottom 50% in South Carolina; top 45% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.520.670.69bottom 45% in South Carolina; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.583.553.50top 39% in South Carolina; top 39% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.270.410.48bottom 36% in South Carolina; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.045.945.8
RN turnover (%)0.042.142.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.36, RN 0.46, weekend 3.10. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Government - Hospital district

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Apella Health Management INCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Spartanburg Regional Health Services District INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%08/02/2015
Apella Health Management INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Apella Health Management INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/29/2025
Davis, BruceIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2020
Holstien, ElmerIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2011
Melin, KurtisIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2025
Morrow, CharlesIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/04/2023
Schaper, ElizabethIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2015
Schaper, ElizabethIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2025
Spartanburg Regional Health Services District INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/02/2015

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Union Post Acute3.8 miUnion, SC★★★★★4/5
Mountainview Nursing Home17.1 miSpartanburg, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5
White Oak Estates19.3 miSpartanburg, SC★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Union →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 425012.