Egle Nursing Home

Name: Egle Nursing Home
Address: 57 JACKSON STREET, Lonaconing, MD, 21539, US
Telephone: 3014635451

57 Jackson Street, Lonaconing, MD 21539 · Allegany County · 66 certified beds · avg 65 residents/day · certified since Jul 11, 1997

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.30

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (42)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Oct 9, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's bedrooms did not give residents visual privacy — such as curtains or dividers — when privacy is needed.
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
May 9, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 9, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
May 9, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
May 9, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 9, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
May 9, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
May 9, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 9, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
May 9, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
May 9, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit.
May 9, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
May 9, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 9, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames.
May 9, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's bedrooms did not give residents visual privacy — such as curtains or dividers — when privacy is needed.
May 16, 2019	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
May 16, 2019	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
May 16, 2019	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 16, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
May 16, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly.
May 16, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
May 16, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 16, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 16, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
May 16, 2019	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (14 → 18).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2019	10	F
2024	14	F
2025	18	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Maryland avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.30	3.83	3.95	bottom 31% in Maryland; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.57	0.83	0.69	bottom 30% in Maryland; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.58	3.43	3.50	bottom 4% in Maryland; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.10	0.63	0.48	bottom 1% in Maryland; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	35.9	40.2	45.8	top 37% in Maryland; top 26% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	22.2	38.7	42.9	top 15% in Maryland; top 17% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.25, RN 0.56, weekend 2.54. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Lauder, Barbara	Individual	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	09/27/2000
Lauder, David	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	25%	09/27/2000
Lauder, George	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	13%	09/27/2000
Metz, Jeffery	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	25%	09/27/2000
Raines, Troy	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	25%	09/27/2000
Lauder, Barbara	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	09/27/2000
Lauder, David	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	09/27/2000
Lauder, David	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	09/27/2000
Lauder, David	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/18/2024
Metz, Jeffery	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	09/27/2000
Metz, Jeffery	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	09/27/2000
Metz, Jeffery	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/18/2024
Raines, Troy	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	09/27/2000
Sidhu, Harjit	Individual	Contracted Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	09/27/2000
Sidhu, Harjit	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/18/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
"What is your policy on physical restraints, and what alternatives do you try first?"
"What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
"If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
"How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
"How do you track that every resident's quarterly assessment happens on time?"
"Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
"Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Moran Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	5.8 mi	Westernport, MD	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Frostburg Rehab Center	6.8 mi	Frostburg, MD	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Mountain City Rehab Center	7.2 mi	Frostburg, MD	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Keyser Healthcare Center	9.3 mi	Keyser, WV	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Complete Care at Dawnview LLC	11.4 mi	Fort Ashby, WV	★★★★☆	3/5
Lions Rehab Center	11.6 mi	Cumberland, MD	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Devlin Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	12.1 mi	Cumberland, MD	★★★☆☆	3/5
Allegany Health Nursing and Rehab	13.5 mi	Cumberland, MD	★★★★☆	4/5
Goodwill Mennonite Home, INC.	13.6 mi	Grantsville, MD	★★★★☆	3/5
Cumberland Healthcare Center	13.7 mi	Cumberland, MD	★★☆☆☆	2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lonaconing →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215307.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Egle Nursing Home

57 Jackson Street, Lonaconing, MD 21539 · 3014635451

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 1/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
☐ "What is your policy on physical restraints, and what alternatives do you try first?"
☐ "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
☐ "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
☐ "How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
☐ "How do you track that every resident's quarterly assessment happens on time?"
☐ "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
☐ "Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 215307 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)