Egle Nursing Home

57 Jackson Street, Lonaconing, MD 21539 (opens Google Maps) · Allegany County · (301) 463-5451· 66 certified beds · avg 65 residents/day · certified since Jul 11, 1997 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected Oct 9, 2025

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.30

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 42 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

Oct 9, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). F-0628
Oct 9, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. F-0604
Oct 9, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. F-0605

View all 42 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Oct 9, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · F-0835
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. · F-0887
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility's bedrooms did not give residents visual privacy — such as curtains or dividers — when privacy is needed. · F-0914
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation. · F-0943
Oct 9, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · F-0947
May 9, 2024	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
May 9, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
May 9, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693
May 9, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550
May 9, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636
May 9, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637
May 9, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
May 9, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688
May 9, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700
May 9, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · F-0711
May 9, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842
May 9, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
May 9, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames. · F-0909
May 9, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility's bedrooms did not give residents visual privacy — such as curtains or dividers — when privacy is needed. · F-0914
May 16, 2019	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908
May 16, 2019	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730
May 16, 2019	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
May 16, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580
May 16, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly. · F-0624
May 16, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · F-0661
May 16, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
May 16, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
May 16, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842
May 16, 2019	B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (14 → 18).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2019

2024

2025

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2019	10	F
2024	14	F
2025	18	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityMaryland averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

3.30

3.83

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

0.57

0.83

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

2.58

3.43

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	Maryland avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.30	3.83	3.95	bottom 31% in Maryland; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.57	0.83	0.69	bottom 30% in Maryland; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.58	3.43	3.50	bottom 4% in Maryland; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.10	0.63	0.48	bottom 1% in Maryland; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	35.9	40.2	45.8	top 37% in Maryland; top 26% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	22.2	38.7	42.9	top 15% in Maryland; top 17% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.25, RN 0.56, weekend 2.54.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.25 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Egle Nursing Home. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Lauder, Barbara	Individual	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	09/27/2000
Lauder, David	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	25%	09/27/2000
Lauder, George	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	13%	09/27/2000
Metz, Jeffery	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	25%	09/27/2000
Raines, Troy	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	25%	09/27/2000
Lauder, Barbara	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	09/27/2000
Lauder, David	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	09/27/2000
Lauder, David	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	09/27/2000
Lauder, David	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/18/2024
Metz, Jeffery	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	09/27/2000
Metz, Jeffery	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	09/27/2000
Metz, Jeffery	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/18/2024
Raines, Troy	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	09/27/2000
Sidhu, Harjit	Individual	Contracted Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	09/27/2000
Sidhu, Harjit	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/18/2024

All 15 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
"What is your policy on physical restraints, and what alternatives do you try first?"
"What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
"If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
"How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
"How do you track that every resident's quarterly assessment happens on time?"
"Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
"Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Maryland midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 36% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"The ownership record on file lists 15 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Moran Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	5.8 mi	Westernport, MD	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Frostburg Rehab Center	6.8 mi	Frostburg, MD	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Mountain City Rehab Center	7.2 mi	Frostburg, MD	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Keyser Healthcare Center	9.3 mi	Keyser, WV	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Complete Care at Dawnview LLC	11.4 mi	Fort Ashby, WV	★★★★☆	3/5
Lions Rehab Center	11.6 mi	Cumberland, MD	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Devlin Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	12.1 mi	Cumberland, MD	★★★☆☆	3/5
Allegany Health Nursing and Rehab	13.5 mi	Cumberland, MD	★★★★☆	4/5
Goodwill Mennonite Home, INC.	13.6 mi	Grantsville, MD	★★★★☆	3/5
Cumberland Healthcare Center	13.7 mi	Cumberland, MD	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Casselman Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center	17.1 mi	Meyersdale, PA	★★☆☆☆	2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lonaconing →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215307.