Devlin Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Name: Devlin Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Address: 10301 NORTH EAST CHRISTIE ROAD, Cumberland, MD, 21502, US
Telephone: 3017241400

10301 North East Christie Road, Cumberland, MD 21502 · Allegany County · 124 certified beds · avg 94 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 1992

Part of chain: FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE (66 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$12,735

Fines, last 3 years

3.37

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 20, 2026 · F-0711 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit.

Why it matters: Without regular documented doctor reviews, changes in a resident's condition and treatment can slip through the cracks.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 2, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jun 30, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Mar 27, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Mar 27, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 27, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role.
Mar 27, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Mar 27, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Mar 27, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 27, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Mar 27, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 27, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Mar 20, 2026	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jan 17, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 20, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility has more than 120 beds but did not hire a qualified full-time social worker as required. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Nov 8, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 9).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2019	2	0	D
2023	3	0	F
2025	3	0	E
2026	17	1	G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $12,735.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Mar 20, 2026	Fine	$12,735

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Maryland avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.37	3.83	3.95	bottom 39% in Maryland; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.59	0.83	0.69	bottom 33% in Maryland; top 49% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.74	3.43	3.50	bottom 10% in Maryland; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.55	0.63	0.48	top 45% in Maryland; top 28% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	42.5	40.2	45.8	bottom 47% in Maryland; top 43% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	35.7	38.7	42.9	top 44% in Maryland; top 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.18, RN 0.56, weekend 2.59. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Forman, Murray	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	—	03/28/2006
Maryland Long Term Care LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	—	03/18/2016
Adams, Christopher	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	01/02/2017
Adams, Christopher	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	01/02/2017

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"How often does each resident's doctor visit and review their care in person?"
"When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
"How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"How do you involve a resident's representative in care decisions, and how quickly are they consulted?"
"If my family member's health suddenly changes, how quickly do you reassess them and update their care?"
"What does the care plan for a brand-new resident cover in the first 48 hours, and who writes it?"
"Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Lions Rehab Center	0.8 mi	Cumberland, MD	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Allegany Health Nursing and Rehab	1.5 mi	Cumberland, MD	★★★★☆	4/5
Cumberland Healthcare Center	2.1 mi	Cumberland, MD	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Frostburg Rehab Center	6.7 mi	Frostburg, MD	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Mountain City Rehab Center	7.7 mi	Frostburg, MD	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Complete Care at Dawnview LLC	9.7 mi	Fort Ashby, WV	★★★★☆	3/5
Egle Nursing Home	12.1 mi	Lonaconing, MD	★☆☆☆☆	3/5
Casselman Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center	16.9 mi	Meyersdale, PA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Moran Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	17.6 mi	Westernport, MD	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Keyser Healthcare Center	19.0 mi	Keyser, WV	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Goodwill Mennonite Home, INC.	20.0 mi	Grantsville, MD	★★★★☆	3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Cumberland →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215244.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Devlin Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

10301 North East Christie Road, Cumberland, MD 21502 · 3017241400

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $12,735

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Mar 20, 2026 (F-0711, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "How often does each resident's doctor visit and review their care in person?"
☐ "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
☐ "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "How do you involve a resident's representative in care decisions, and how quickly are they consulted?"
☐ "If my family member's health suddenly changes, how quickly do you reassess them and update their care?"
☐ "What does the care plan for a brand-new resident cover in the first 48 hours, and who writes it?"
☐ "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 215244 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)