MinnesotaSleepy Eye

Divine Providence Community Home

700 Third Avenue Northwest, Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 · Brown County · 50 certified beds · avg 46 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1991

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.05
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 10, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 7, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (14)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 15, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.
Apr 15, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Apr 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Apr 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Mar 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Mar 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 10, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Feb 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202451G ▲
202520D
202670F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.054.833.95bottom 17% in Minnesota; top 37% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.921.220.69bottom 25% in Minnesota; top 19% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.714.273.50bottom 25% in Minnesota; top 33% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.460.690.48bottom 29% in Minnesota; top 38% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)34.142.245.8top 32% in Minnesota; top 22% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.038.642.9top 1% in Minnesota; top 1% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.42, RN 0.78, weekend 3.13. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Butler, RitaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Groebner, JaynaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/26/2011
Groebner, JaynaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/19/2025
Haas, CarynIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Hubler, MargaretIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Kosman, JanetIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/13/2021
Murthy, VenkataIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/1995
Murthy, VenkataIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/19/2025
Williams, SharonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/13/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Sleepy Eye Rehabilitati Center1.4 miSleepy Eye, MN★★★★☆4/5
Gil-Mor Manor12.0 miMorgan, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Oak Hills Living Center12.3 miNew Ulm, MN★★★★☆3/5
St John Lutheran Home12.9 miSpringfield, MN★★★★☆3/5
Franklin Restorative Care Center16.6 miFranklin, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Sleepy Eye →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245599.