AlabamaDadeville

Dadeville Healthcare Center

351 North East Street, Dadeville, AL 36853 · Tallapoosa County · 144 certified beds · avg 101 residents/day · certified since Aug 1, 1978

Part of chain: PRIME HEALTH CARE ENTERPRISES (5 facilities, chain avg rating 4.0★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.18
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 22, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Apr 22, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 22, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 22, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Apr 22, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Apr 22, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 22, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Feb 14, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Jan 4, 2018F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Jan 4, 2018D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Jan 4, 2018D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have doctor's orders in place for a resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
Jan 4, 2018D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Jan 4, 2018D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 4, 2018D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jan 4, 2018D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jan 4, 2018D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201880F
201910D
202170E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityAlabama avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.184.433.95top 14% in Alabama; top 11% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.760.740.69top 41% in Alabama; top 31% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.383.733.50top 14% in Alabama; top 14% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.210.360.48bottom 15% in Alabama; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)34.546.945.8top 14% in Alabama; top 23% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)14.339.542.9top 7% in Alabama; top 7% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.41, RN 0.65, weekend 3.73. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Prime Health Care Enterprises, INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest01/01/2004
Prime Healthcare Enterprise LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest05/28/2004
Prime Health Care Enterprises, INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2004
Prime Management, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2003
Servisfirst BankOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/28/2012
Stephenson, VickyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Chapman Healthcare Center, INC10.9 miAlexander City, AL★★★★★4/5
Adams Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center13.0 miAlexander City, AL★★★★★5/5
Brown Nursing Home15.2 miAlexander City, AL★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Dadeville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 015166.