800 S 15th St, Sebring, OH 44672 (opens Google Maps) · Mahoning County · (330) 938-6126· 150 certified beds · avg 112 residents/day · certified since Feb 5, 1982 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jan 15, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. F-0688
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Mar 24, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Mar 24, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jan 15, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Mar 20, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Mar 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Mar 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Mar 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange for a doctor to be available for emergencies 24 hours a day. · from a complaint · F-0713 |
| Sep 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Sep 1, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| Sep 1, 2022 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 4 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $13,870.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2026 | Fine | $13,870 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Ohio avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.90 | 3.45 | 3.95 | top 4% in Ohio; top 15% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.78 | 0.60 | 0.69 | top 17% in Ohio; top 29% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.88 | 3.07 | 3.50 | top 8% in Ohio; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.48 | top 39% in Ohio; top 43% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 34.1 | 48.7 | 45.8 | top 14% in Ohio; top 22% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 43.8 | 43.9 | 42.9 | top 50% in Ohio; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.61, RN 0.73, weekend 3.65.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.61 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Crandall Nursing Home. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caserta, Daniele | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Drakulich, Tom | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Gant, Tom | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Kiko, Russell | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2016 |
| Mannion, David | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/12/2010 |
| Mannion, David | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| Mendel, Ron | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Myers, Craig | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| New, Greg | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Roose, Randi | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/30/2019 |
| Scarpitti, John | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2017 |
| Williams, Bill | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2016 |
All 12 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bel Air Care Center | 3.5 mi | Alliance, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Auburn Skilled Nursing and Rehab | 3.7 mi | Salem, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Altercare of Alliance Ctr for Rehab & NC INC | 5.9 mi | Alliance, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Roselawn Gardens Nursing & Rehabilitation | 6.0 mi | Alliance, OH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| McCrea Manor NSNG and Rehab Ctr LLC | 6.2 mi | Alliance, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Canterbury Villa of Alliance | 7.1 mi | Alliance, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Blossom Nursing and Rehab Center | 8.6 mi | Salem, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Circle of Care | 9.8 mi | Salem, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Louisville Gardens Care Center | 9.9 mi | Louisville, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Salem West Healthcare Center | 10.1 mi | Salem, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Salem North Healthcare Center | 10.1 mi | Salem, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Green Meadows Skilled Nursing and Rehab | 10.5 mi | Louisville, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Mahoning, OH — 29 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365574.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details