MissouriFulton

Kingdom Care Senior Living

811 Center Street, Fulton, MO 65251 · Callaway County · 36 certified beds · avg 27 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1994

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.04
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 15, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 15, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.
Apr 15, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 15, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 15, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 15, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Apr 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Apr 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Apr 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not bring in qualified outside professionals to provide a required service when it didn't have a qualified professional on staff.
Apr 15, 2026C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jan 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · from a complaint
Dec 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Sep 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 12, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Sep 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Sep 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Sep 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Sep 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Sep 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Sep 13, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post the names, addresses, and phone numbers of state agencies and advocacy groups, along with a notice that residents may file complaints with the state survey agency.
Sep 13, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023100E
202450E
202510E
2026110F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.043.663.95top 8% in Missouri; top 13% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.710.490.69top 12% in Missouri; top 35% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.513.223.50top 8% in Missouri; top 12% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.440.330.48top 15% in Missouri; top 42% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.056.045.8
RN turnover (%)0.047.842.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.89, RN 0.55, weekend 3.48. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Aycock, MichelleIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2020
Aycock, WilliamIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2020
Aycock, MichelleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/12/2020
Aycock, WilliamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2020
Gerard, ChandaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2021
Gerard, ChandaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2021
Sjoblom, BethIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Young, BobbieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2020
Young, BobbieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2020

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Fulton Nursing & Rehab0.5 miFulton, MO★★☆☆☆2/5
Fulton Manor Care Center1.1 miFulton, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Riverview Nursing Center12.3 miMokane, MO★★★★☆5/5
Lenoir Health Care Center18.9 miColumbia, MO★★★★★5/5
Neighborhoods Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing B19.3 miColumbia, MO★★☆☆☆2/5
Bluffs, the19.4 miColumbia, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Columbia Post Acute19.7 miColumbia, MO★★★★★5/5
Columbia Manor Health & Rehabilitation19.9 miColumbia, MO★★☆☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Fulton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265581.