North CarolinaHayesville

Clay County Health and Rehabilitation

86 Valley Hideaway Drive, Hayesville, NC 28904 · Clay County · 90 certified beds · avg 78 residents/day · certified since Mar 30, 1993

Part of chain: AVARDIS HEALTH (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.0★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.96
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 1, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.
May 1, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
May 1, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
May 1, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit.
May 1, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
May 1, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
May 1, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 1, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 1, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
May 1, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
May 1, 2026B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule.
Feb 27, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Oct 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Oct 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Oct 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330E
202530E
2026110F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNorth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.964.013.95top 33% in North Carolina; top 41% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.490.640.69bottom 42% in North Carolina; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.593.563.50top 31% in North Carolina; top 38% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.270.410.48bottom 38% in North Carolina; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)49.449.045.8bottom 48% in North Carolina; bottom 38% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)66.745.742.9bottom 21% in North Carolina; bottom 15% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.17, RN 0.39, weekend 2.87. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Evh Holdco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Hayesville Parentco LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Ncop Holdco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Nu C II Irrevocable TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Nu C Irrevocable TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
SNF Care Centers LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Zenith Holdco II LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Zenith Holdco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Chandross, MarkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Chandross, MarkIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Garrett, KathieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Garrett, KathieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Hoback, TiffanyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Hoback, TiffanyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Hoback, TiffanyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Jones, TequillaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Jones, TequillaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Semones, BrandiIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Semones, BrandiIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Semones, BrandiIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Chatuge Regional Nursing Home7.4 miHiawassee, GA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Valley View Care and Rehabilitation10.7 miAndrews, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
Union County Nursing Home13.9 miBlairsville, GA★★★★☆4/5
Murphy Rehabilitation & Nursing18.0 miMurphy, NC★★★★☆4/5
Graham Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center18.6 miRobbinsville, NC★★☆☆☆2/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Hayesville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345433.