Charlottesville Health & Rehabilitation Center
505 West Rio Road, Charlottesville, VA 22901 · Albemarle County · 105 certified beds · avg 101 residents/day · certified since Jan 29, 1988
Part of chain: LIFEWORKS REHAB (64 facilities, chain avg rating 2.1★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.88
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (50)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint |
| Sep 4, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · from a complaint |
| Sep 4, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint |
| Sep 4, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint |
| Sep 4, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Sep 4, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · from a complaint |
| Sep 4, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint |
| Mar 19, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint |
| Mar 19, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide residents with enough to drink, or with drinks matching their needs and preferences, to keep them properly hydrated. · from a complaint |
| Mar 19, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. · from a complaint |
| Mar 19, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · from a complaint |
| Mar 19, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint |
| Dec 4, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint |
| Jul 10, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not properly protect the personal money residents deposited with it for safekeeping. |
| Jul 10, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint |
| Jul 10, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jul 10, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. |
| Jul 10, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. |
| Jul 10, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. |
| Jul 10, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Jul 10, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint |
| Jul 10, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Jul 10, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. |
| Jul 10, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. · from a complaint |
| Jul 10, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Jul 10, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Jul 10, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. |
| Apr 10, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint |
| Apr 10, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint |
| Apr 10, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint |
| Dec 5, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint |
| Dec 5, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint |
| Nov 9, 2021 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Nov 9, 2021 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Nov 9, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. |
| Nov 9, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Nov 9, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Nov 9, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Feb 14, 2019 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Feb 14, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. |
| Feb 14, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. |
| Feb 14, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Feb 14, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Feb 14, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. |
| Feb 14, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Feb 14, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Feb 14, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Feb 14, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. |
| Feb 14, 2019 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. |
| Feb 14, 2019 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 14).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 12 | 0 | E |
| 2021 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 18 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 12 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Virginia avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.88 | 3.67 | 3.95 | bottom 16% in Virginia; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.69 | top 24% in Virginia; top 39% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.50 | 3.21 | 3.50 | bottom 18% in Virginia; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.59 | 0.46 | 0.48 | top 16% in Virginia; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 55.2 | 48.1 | 45.8 | bottom 33% in Virginia; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 48.2 | 42.9 | top 50% in Virginia; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.09, RN 0.73, weekend 2.69. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ak 2003 Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Al 2003 Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Central Bay LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Charles 1994 Family Grantor Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Charlottesville Holdings I LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 05/28/2021 |
| Edward 1998 Family Grantor Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Golden 2017 Family Grantor Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Golden 2017 LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Matt 2002 Family Grantor Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Matt 2002 LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| MRCZ Central LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Nathan 5604 & Family LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Nathan 5604 Family Grantor Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Nathan 5604 LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Pivotal Central LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Sas 1998 Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Saul 2012 Family Grantor Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Allen Santos, Annette | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/28/2021 |
| Rajchenbach, Moshe | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/28/2021 |
| Rybst Central Manager LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/28/2021 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
- "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
- "What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
- "Before a resident is discharged or transferred, how do you make sure the new place can actually meet their needs?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How often does each resident's doctor visit and review their care in person?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Our Lady of Peace INC | 1.0 mi | Charlottesville, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Laurels of Charlottesville | 1.1 mi | Charlottesville, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Monroe Health & Rehab Center | 1.3 mi | Charlottesville, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Colonnades Health Care Center | 2.1 mi | Charlottesville, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Cedars Healthcare Center | 2.3 mi | Charlottesville, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Westminster Canterbury Blue Ri | 4.6 mi | Charlottesville, VA | ★★★★★ | 3/5 | |
| Albemarle Health & Rehabilitation Center | 6.0 mi | Charlottesville, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Greene Acres Rehabilitation and Nursing | 14.5 mi | Stanardsville, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Charlottesville →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 495178.