KentuckyGrayson

Carter Nursing and Rehabilitation

250 McDavid Boulevard, Grayson, KY 41143 · Carter County · 120 certified beds · avg 110 residents/day · certified since Feb 21, 1991

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: DAVID MARX (10 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$18,000
Fines, last 3 years
3.21
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Jul 17, 2023 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Aug 6, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 29, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 12, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 29, 2025 · F-0609 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.

Why it matters: When incidents aren't reported promptly, abusers may continue harming residents and outside authorities can't step in.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 12, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Aug 29, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 17, 2023▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jul 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jul 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds.
Jul 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility hired someone with an official finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft against them. Facilities are not allowed to employ people with such findings.
Jul 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jul 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jul 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Jul 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 7, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201910D
2023101K ▲
202552G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $18,000.

DateTypeAmount / length
Aug 29, 2025Fine$8,000
Aug 29, 2025Fine$10,000

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityKentucky avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.213.713.95bottom 36% in Kentucky; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.370.740.69bottom 11% in Kentucky; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.543.273.50bottom 15% in Kentucky; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.210.530.48bottom 10% in Kentucky; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)68.546.445.8bottom 5% in Kentucky; bottom 7% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)61.541.842.9bottom 16% in Kentucky; bottom 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.21, RN 0.37, weekend 2.54. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Carter Nursing and Rehabilitation Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%07/25/2019
250 McDavid Blvd SNF Realty Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2019
250 McDavid Blvd SNF Realty LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2019
250 McDavid Blvd SNF Realty LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2019
Alexander, DavidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Alexander, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Bluegrass Consulting Group LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2019
Bluegrass Consulting Group LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/16/2025
Chamberlain, MargaretIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/11/2023
Chamberlain, MargaretIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/11/2023
Gibbs, SarahIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Gibbs, SarahIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Kentucky SNF Realty Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2019
Marx, DavidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2019
Marx, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2019
MDG Real Estate Global LimitedOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2019
Pruitt, PaulIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Pruitt, PaulIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Pruitt, PaulIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Rewa, AngelaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/23/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Boyd Nursing and Rehabilitation10.1 miAshland, KY★★★☆☆2/5
Kingsbrook Lifecare Center14.3 miAshland, KY★★★★☆3/5
Wurtland Nursing and Rehabilitation17.1 miWurtland, KY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Woodland Oaks17.7 miAshland, KY★★★★☆4/5
Oakmont Manor18.2 miFlatwoods, KY★★★☆☆3/5
Sanctuary at Ohio Valley18.9 miIronton, OH★★★★☆4/5
Harbor Healthcare of Ironton19.3 miIronton, OH★★★★☆3/5
Crystal Care of Coal Grove19.5 miCoal Grove, OH★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Grayson →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 185253.