OhioBurbank

Burbank Parke Care Center

14976 Burbank Road, Burbank, OH 44214 · Wayne County · 81 certified beds · avg 76 residents/day · certified since Sep 16, 2010

Part of chain: JAG HEALTHCARE (9 facilities, chain avg rating 3.3★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.06
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jul 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jul 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 29, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Dec 29, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 29, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Dec 29, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Dec 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Dec 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Dec 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Dec 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Dec 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 20, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jan 20, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals.
Feb 28, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 28, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 28, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 28, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201940D
202240F
2023100F
202440E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOhio avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.063.453.95bottom 29% in Ohio; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.420.600.69bottom 24% in Ohio; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.463.073.50bottom 11% in Ohio; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.280.420.48bottom 24% in Ohio; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)29.248.745.8top 7% in Ohio; top 13% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)25.043.942.9top 20% in Ohio; top 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.48, RN 0.48, weekend 2.80. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Burbank Park Re, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2017
Burbank Park Re, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2017
Burbank Park Re, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2017
Fiser, LaurenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Fiser, LaurenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Griffiths, JamesIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/04/2013
Griffiths, JamesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2013
Griffiths, JamesIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2013
Jag Healthcare INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2013
Jag Healthcare INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2013
Khandelwal, ShobhaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/16/2010
Khandelwal, ShobhaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/16/2010

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Avenue at Wooster9.3 miWooster, OH★★★☆☆2/5
Smithville Western Care Center10.0 miWooster, OH★★☆☆☆2/5
Champion Creek Health and Rehabilitation11.1 miMedina, OH—/5
West View Healthy Living11.4 miWooster, OH★★★★☆4/5
Apostolic Christian Home INC11.6 miRittman, OH★★★★★4/5
Wooster Community Hospital SNF11.6 miWooster, OH★★★★★5/5
Country Pointe11.7 miWooster, OH★★★★★5/5
Autumnwood Nursing & Rehab Center11.7 miRittman, OH★★☆☆☆1/5
Medina Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing12.7 miMedina, OH★★☆☆☆1/5SFF
Glendora Health Care Center12.9 miWooster, OH★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Burbank →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 366392.