Brookside Skilled Nursing Hospital

2620 Flores Street, San Mateo, CA 94403 (opens Google Maps) · San Mateo County · (650) 349-2161· 96 certified beds · avg 78 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected Apr 16, 2026

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

4.56

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 22 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

Apr 16, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
Apr 16, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. F-0925
Apr 16, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656

View all 22 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Apr 16, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Apr 16, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925
Apr 16, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Apr 16, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Apr 16, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759
Apr 16, 2026	B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern	The facility had resident rooms holding more people than allowed — no more than 4 residents per room, and no more than 2 per room in buildings constructed after November 28, 2016. · F-0911
Mar 28, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684
Oct 25, 2024	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · F-0801
Oct 25, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759
Oct 25, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Oct 25, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Oct 25, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Oct 25, 2024	B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern	The facility had resident rooms holding more people than allowed — no more than 4 residents per room, and no more than 2 per room in buildings constructed after November 28, 2016. · F-0911
Sep 18, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609
Jan 14, 2022	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Jan 14, 2022	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925
Jan 14, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Jan 14, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Jan 14, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Jan 14, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
Jan 14, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Jan 14, 2022	B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern	The facility had resident rooms holding more people than allowed — no more than 4 residents per room, and no more than 2 per room in buildings constructed after November 28, 2016. · F-0911

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2022

2024

2025

2026

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2022	8	F
2024	7	F
2025	1	D
2026	6	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityCalifornia averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

4.56

4.31

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

0.95

0.61

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

4.11

3.90

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	California avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.56	4.31	3.95	top 26% in California; top 22% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.95	0.61	0.69	top 12% in California; top 18% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.11	3.90	3.50	top 27% in California; top 20% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.56	0.51	0.48	top 25% in California; top 26% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	28.2	36.7	45.8	top 24% in California; top 11% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	28.6	38.1	42.9	top 33% in California; top 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.16, RN 0.87, weekend 3.76.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.16 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Brookside Skilled Nursing Hospital. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
St Johns Volunteers	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	01/01/1967
Danich, Katherine	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/1988
Danich, Katherine	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/1988
Danich, Katherine	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2014
Danich, Katherine	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/1988
Danich, Michael	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2011
Danich, Michael	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2011
Danich, Michael	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2014
Danich, Michael	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2011
Danich, Svetoslav	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/1988
Danich, Svetoslav	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/1988
Danich, Svetoslav	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2014
Danich, Svetoslav	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/1988
Grimes, Jeremy	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2014
Grimes, Jeremy	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2014
Grimes, Vivian	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2014
Grimes, Vivian	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2014
Inpatient Consultants of California INC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/20/2024
Inpatient Consultants of California INC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/20/2024
Motoviloff, Irene	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2000

Showing 20 of 31 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 11 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"How is pest control handled here, and when was the last treatment or inspection?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
"How many residents share each room, and what options are there for more privacy?"
"Do you have a qualified dietician on staff, and how involved are they in each resident's nutrition plan?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 28% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"The ownership record on file lists 31 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 101 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
San Mateo Medical Center D/P SNF	1.1 mi	San Mateo, CA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Belmont Healthcare Center	2.6 mi	Belmont, CA	★★★★★	5/5
Peninsula Post-Acute	5.2 mi	Burlingame, CA	★★★★☆	4/5
Millbrae Care Center	6.1 mi	Millbrae, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Devonshire Oaks Nursing Center	6.3 mi	Redwood City, CA	★★★★★	4/5
San Bruno Skilled Nursing	8.5 mi	San Bruno, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
Atherton Park Post-Acute	9.1 mi	Menlo Park, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
VI at Palo Alto	10.1 mi	Palo Alto, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Webster House	10.4 mi	Palo Alto, CA	★★★★★	5/5
Palo Alto Post-Acute	10.8 mi	Palo Alto, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
Linda Mar Care Center	10.9 mi	Pacifica, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Pacifica Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	12.4 mi	Pacifica, CA	★★★★★	5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in San Mateo, CA — 14 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Golden Heights Healthcare — Daly City, CA · overall 5/5
Golden Pavilion Healthcare — Daly City, CA · overall 3/5

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in San Mateo →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 055188.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

The Care File

Visit checklist — Brookside Skilled Nursing Hospital

2620 Flores Street, San Mateo, CA 94403 · (650) 349-2161

Health inspection rating 4/5 · CMS overall 5/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "How is pest control handled here, and when was the last treatment or inspection?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
☐ "How many residents share each room, and what options are there for more privacy?"
☐ "Do you have a qualified dietician on staff, and how involved are they in each resident's nutrition plan?"
☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
☐ "CMS reports 28% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
☐ "The ownership record on file lists 31 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
☐ "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 055188 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)