Brookside Skilled Nursing Hospital
2620 Flores Street, San Mateo, CA 94403 · San Mateo County · 96 certified beds · avg 78 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (22)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Apr 16, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. |
| Apr 16, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Apr 16, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Apr 16, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Apr 16, 2026 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility had resident rooms holding more people than allowed — no more than 4 residents per room, and no more than 2 per room in buildings constructed after November 28, 2016. |
| Mar 28, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Oct 25, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. |
| Oct 25, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Oct 25, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Oct 25, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Oct 25, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Oct 25, 2024 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility had resident rooms holding more people than allowed — no more than 4 residents per room, and no more than 2 per room in buildings constructed after November 28, 2016. |
| Sep 18, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Jan 14, 2022 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jan 14, 2022 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. |
| Jan 14, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jan 14, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Jan 14, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Jan 14, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Jan 14, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Jan 14, 2022 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility had resident rooms holding more people than allowed — no more than 4 residents per room, and no more than 2 per room in buildings constructed after November 28, 2016. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 8 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 6 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.56 | 4.31 | 3.95 | top 26% in California; top 22% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.95 | 0.61 | 0.69 | top 12% in California; top 18% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.11 | 3.90 | 3.50 | top 27% in California; top 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.56 | 0.51 | 0.48 | top 25% in California; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 28.2 | 36.7 | 45.8 | top 24% in California; top 11% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 28.6 | 38.1 | 42.9 | top 33% in California; top 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.16, RN 0.87, weekend 3.76. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Who owns this facility
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Johns Volunteers | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/01/1967 |
| Danich, Katherine | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1988 |
| Danich, Katherine | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1988 |
| Danich, Katherine | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Danich, Katherine | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1988 |
| Danich, Michael | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2011 |
| Danich, Michael | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2011 |
| Danich, Michael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Danich, Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2011 |
| Danich, Svetoslav | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1988 |
| Danich, Svetoslav | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1988 |
| Danich, Svetoslav | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Danich, Svetoslav | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1988 |
| Grimes, Jeremy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Grimes, Jeremy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Grimes, Vivian | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Grimes, Vivian | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Inpatient Consultants of California INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/20/2024 |
| Inpatient Consultants of California INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/20/2024 |
| Motoviloff, Irene | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2000 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How is pest control handled here, and when was the last treatment or inspection?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
- "How many residents share each room, and what options are there for more privacy?"
- "Do you have a qualified dietician on staff, and how involved are they in each resident's nutrition plan?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| San Mateo Medical Center D/P SNF | 1.1 mi | San Mateo, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Belmont Healthcare Center | 2.6 mi | Belmont, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Peninsula Post-Acute | 5.2 mi | Burlingame, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Millbrae Care Center | 6.1 mi | Millbrae, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Devonshire Oaks Nursing Center | 6.3 mi | Redwood City, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| San Bruno Skilled Nursing | 8.5 mi | San Bruno, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Atherton Park Post-Acute | 9.1 mi | Menlo Park, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| VI at Palo Alto | 10.1 mi | Palo Alto, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Webster House | 10.4 mi | Palo Alto, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Palo Alto Post-Acute | 10.8 mi | Palo Alto, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Linda Mar Care Center | 10.9 mi | Pacifica, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Pacifica Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 12.4 mi | Pacifica, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 055188.