Wisconsin ›Oshkosh

Bethel Home

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

225 N Eagle St, Oshkosh, WI 54902 (opens Google Maps) · Winnebago County · (920) 235-4653· 100 certified beds · avg 62 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1994 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Sep 10, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Aug 13, 2025
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.18
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Aug 13, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Jul 31, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. F-0755

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. F-0883

View all 11 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 10, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Sep 10, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
Sep 10, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883
Aug 13, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Oct 23, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657
Oct 23, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide or obtain x-rays and other imaging tests when ordered, or did not promptly tell the ordering doctor the results. · from a complaint · F-0777
Aug 7, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623
Aug 7, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625
Jun 7, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Jun 7, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
Jun 7, 2023B · Potential for minimal harm, patternThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 3).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 1

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330D
202440D
202541J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityWisconsin averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.18
Wisconsin average: 4.29
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.23
Wisconsin average: 1.01
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.75
Wisconsin average: 3.84
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityWisconsin avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.184.293.95top 47% in Wisconsin; top 33% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.231.010.69top 24% in Wisconsin; top 9% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.753.843.50top 46% in Wisconsin; top 31% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.840.680.48top 23% in Wisconsin; top 10% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)43.646.945.8top 42% in Wisconsin; top 46% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)7.739.742.9top 3% in Wisconsin; top 3% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.12, RN 1.21, weekend 3.69.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.12 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Bethel Home. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Miravida LivingOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/1965
Beecher, MarkIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Bermingham, KathyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Bertram, TheresaIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/31/2015
Bertram, TheresaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/07/2013
Bonell, JamieIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
McNiel, PaulaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Miravida LivingOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1965
Muller, LaurieIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Murken, MaryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Olson, MargaretIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/14/2016
Olson, NateIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Rieckman, StewIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021

All 13 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
  • "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
  • "What percentage of your residents and staff are vaccinated against flu and pneumonia, and how do you offer the vaccines?"
  • "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
  • "If a doctor orders an x-ray, how soon does it happen and when does the doctor see the results?"
  • "If you ever planned to discharge or transfer my family member, how much written notice would we receive and how could we appeal?"
  • "If my family member goes to the hospital, how long will you hold their bed, and will we get that in writing?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 44% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 13 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 17 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Evergreen Health Center0.8 miOshkosh, WI★★★★☆4/5
Eden Rehab Suites and Green House Homes2.2 miOshkosh, WI★★☆☆☆2/5
Edenbrook of Oshkosh2.6 miOshkosh, WI★★★☆☆3/5
Park View Health Center4.5 miOshkosh, WI★★★★★5/5
Edenbrook Omro9.0 miOmro, WI★★★★☆4/5
Oakridge Gardens Nur Ctr, INC16.6 miMenasha, WI★★★☆☆3/5
Peabody Manor16.9 miAppleton, WI★★★★☆3/5
Whispering Pines Nursing and Rehab, LLC17.3 miRipon, WI★★★☆☆3/5
Fond Du Lac Lutheran Home17.4 miFond Du Lac, WI★★★☆☆3/5
Avina of Fond Du Lac17.4 miFond Du Lac, WI★★☆☆☆2/5
Meadowbrook at Appleton17.9 miAppleton, WI★★☆☆☆2/5
St Francis Home18.1 miFond Du Lac, WI★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Oshkosh →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 525554.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details