2001 Forest Ridge Dr, Bedford, TX 76021 (opens Google Maps) · Tarrant County · (817) 571-6804· 166 certified beds · avg 140 residents/day · certified since Apr 5, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT (66 facilities, chain avg rating 2.3★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Sep 13, 2024 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Sep 14, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint F-0656
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Nov 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690 |
| Nov 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Nov 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint · F-0919 |
| Mar 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly run its feeding assistant program — assessing which residents are appropriate for it, following each resident's care plan, and making sure feeding assistants are trained and supervised. Feeding assistants are trained helpers who assist residents at mealtimes. · from a complaint · F-0811 |
| Feb 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint · F-0655 |
| Feb 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Feb 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Jan 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Aug 4, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure resident assessments were done by a qualified health professional. Assessments guide all of a resident's care, so the person doing them must be properly trained. · F-0642 |
| Aug 4, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 2 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2025 | 12 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $13,627.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2024 | Fine | $13,627 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.45 | 3.46 | 3.95 | bottom 2% in Texas; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.36 | 0.44 | 0.69 | bottom 42% in Texas; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.17 | 3.04 | 3.50 | bottom 3% in Texas; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.22 | 0.34 | 0.48 | bottom 28% in Texas; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 57.8 | 55.3 | 45.8 | bottom 37% in Texas; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 56.5 | 54.6 | 42.9 | bottom 46% in Texas; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.85, RN 0.42, weekend 2.52.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (2.85 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Bedford Wellness & Rehabilitation. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Individual
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 08/16/2018 |
| 2001 Forest Ridge Drive TX, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2018 |
| Byrom, David | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2018 |
| Continuum Rehab Group LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2018 |
| Forest Ridge Post Acute, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2018 |
| Garetz, David | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2018 |
| Gibraltar Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2018 |
| Gurwitz, Solomon | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/25/2025 |
| Hagins, Elizabeth | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2025 |
| Haider, Munawar | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2015 |
| Kaplan, Esther | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/25/2025 |
| Kaplan, Mordechai | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2025 |
| Magnolia Realty, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2018 |
| Millennial Acquisitions, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2018 |
| Mindle, Adam | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/25/2025 |
| Montgomery Sky Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2018 |
| Onwukegwu, Edwin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/21/2023 |
| Opco Ca Skilled Mgmt INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2018 |
| Opco Texas Skilled Mgmt LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2018 |
| Oregon Realty, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2018 |
Showing 20 of 23 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 3 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Opco Skilled Management — 66 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 65 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| La Dora Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 0.5 mi | Bedford, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Parkwood Village | 1.1 mi | Bedford, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Westpark Rehabilitation and Living | 1.5 mi | Euless, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Hurst Plaza Nursing and Rehab | 1.6 mi | Hurst, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Forum Parkway Health & Rehabilitation | 1.7 mi | Bedford, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Oakmont Guest Care Center | 2.8 mi | Hurst, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Avir at Emerald Hills | 4.2 mi | North Richland Hills, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Glenview Wellness & Rehabilitation | 4.3 mi | North Richland Hills, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bear Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation | 5.3 mi | Grapevine, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Avir at Richland Hills | 5.4 mi | Richland Hills, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Keller Oaks Healthcare Center | 5.7 mi | Keller, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Purehealth Transitional Care at THR Arlington | 5.8 mi | Arlington, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Tarrant, TX — 71 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 455798.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details