TexasGrand Saline

Avir at Grand Saline

1638 Vz Cr 1803, Grand Saline, TX 75140 · Van Zandt County · 120 certified beds · avg 80 residents/day · certified since Jul 3, 2001

Part of chain: AVIR HEALTH GROUP (116 facilities, chain avg rating 2.3★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$8,410
Fines, last 3 years
3.96
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 29, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Sep 9, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Mar 22, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Feb 4, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 4, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Feb 4, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Feb 4, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Feb 4, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Feb 4, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's activities program was not run by a qualified professional. The person directing recreation and social activities must have proper training or credentials.
Feb 4, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 29, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
May 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
May 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
May 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Nov 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Oct 18, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202310E
202430E
202591J ▲
202690F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,410.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 29, 2025Fine$8,410

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.963.463.95top 16% in Texas; top 41% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.170.440.69bottom 4% in Texas; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.633.043.50top 13% in Texas; top 36% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.120.340.48bottom 5% in Texas; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)42.055.345.8top 25% in Texas; top 42% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.054.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.68, RN 0.16, weekend 3.37. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
1638 VR CR 1803 Holdings, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/01/2025
TX SNF Holdings ,LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%04/01/2025
1638 VZ CR 1803 Property Owner, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
1638 VZ CR 1803 Property Owner, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Freund, NochumIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Mayhugh, LindaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Mayhugh, LindaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Travitsky, AaronIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Welltower INCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Welltower INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Welltower NNN Group, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Welltower NNN Group, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2020
Welltower Op, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Welltower Op, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Azalea Trail Nursing and Rehabilitation Center0.5 miGrand Saline, TX★★★★☆5/5
Avir at Bradburn0.8 miGrand Saline, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Van Healthcare11.7 miVan, TX★★★★☆4/5
Avir at Mineola13.2 miMineola, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Canton Oaks13.2 miCanton, TX★★★★☆4/5
Mineola Gardens Wellness & Rehabilitation13.7 miMineola, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Emory Health and Rehab14.3 miEmory, TX★★★☆☆4/5
Crestwood Health and Rehabilitation Center16.3 miWills Point, TX★★★★★5/5
Quitman Wellness & Rehabilitation18.2 miQuitman, TX★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Grand Saline →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675878.