139 Pearl Street, Auburn, KY 42206 (opens Google Maps) · Logan County · (270) 542-4111· 66 certified beds · avg 63 residents/day · certified since Mar 30, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Mar 7, 2026 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 13, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Mar 7, 2026 · F-0678 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 13, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint F-0656
The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint F-0678
The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. F-0645
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2026 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Mar 7, 2026 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint · F-0678 |
| Sep 12, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Sep 12, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Sep 12, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them. · F-0865 |
| Sep 12, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Sep 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Sep 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Sep 12, 2025 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Apr 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Apr 22, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Apr 22, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| Jan 17, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jan 17, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Jan 17, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jan 17, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. · F-0808 |
| Jan 17, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Jan 17, 2020 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 8).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2022 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 9 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 2 | 2 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
2 fines totaling $24,850.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2026 | Fine | $12,425 |
| Mar 7, 2026 | Fine | $12,425 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Kentucky avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.86 | 3.71 | 3.95 | bottom 13% in Kentucky; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.40 | 0.74 | 0.69 | bottom 14% in Kentucky; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.58 | 3.27 | 3.50 | bottom 17% in Kentucky; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.37 | 0.53 | 0.48 | bottom 35% in Kentucky; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 86.5 | 46.4 | 45.8 | bottom 1% in Kentucky; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 83.3 | 41.8 | 42.9 | bottom 2% in Kentucky; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.06, RN 0.43, weekend 2.77.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.06 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Auburn Nursing and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company · changed ownership in the last 12 months
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ky 2 HB Op LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/07/2025 |
| Ab 139 Pearl Street Holdco LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/07/2025 |
| Ab 139 Pearl Street LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/07/2025 |
| Auburn Fiscal LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/07/2025 |
| Auburn Opco Holdco LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/07/2025 |
| Brecher, Hal | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/07/2025 |
| Carter, Valarie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2026 |
| Carter, Valarie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2026 |
| Frankel, Sheftal | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/07/2025 |
| Frankel, Sheftal | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/07/2025 |
| Hsieh, Anson | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/07/2025 |
| Hsieh, Anson | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/07/2025 |
| Kelman, Moshe | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/07/2025 |
| Kelman, Moshe | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/07/2025 |
| Kelman, Moshe | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/07/2025 |
| Ky 2 Ao Op LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/07/2025 |
| Ky 2 Ao Prop LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/07/2025 |
| Ky 2 Ap Prop LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/07/2025 |
| Ky 2 Ft Op LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/07/2025 |
| Ky 2 Ft Prop LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/07/2025 |
Showing 20 of 25 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 5 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creekwood Nursing & Rehabilitation | 10.1 mi | Russellville, KY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Hopkins Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 10.2 mi | Woodburn, KY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Franklin-Simpson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 12.8 mi | Franklin, KY | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Colonial Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 15.1 mi | Bowling Green, KY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Christian Health Center | 15.9 mi | Bowling Green, KY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Magnolia Village Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 15.9 mi | Bowling Green, KY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Bowling Green Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 16.8 mi | Bowling Green, KY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Greenwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 17.0 mi | Bowling Green, KY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Signature Healthcare of Bowling Green | 17.7 mi | Bowling Green, KY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 185049.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details