How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1910 Pepperell Pkwy, Opelika, AL 36801 (opens Google Maps) · Lee County · (334) 749-1471· 225 certified beds · avg 122 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1979 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: TRAYLOR PORTER HEALTHCARE (5 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. F-0690
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. F-0695
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 24, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Feb 24, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jun 6, 2019 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 6, 2019 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| Jun 6, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Jun 6, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jun 6, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 21, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jun 21, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jun 21, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2019 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2022 | 3 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Alabama avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.87 | 4.43 | 3.95 | top 24% in Alabama; top 15% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.69 | top 43% in Alabama; top 31% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.06 | 3.73 | 3.50 | top 22% in Alabama; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.52 | 0.36 | 0.48 | top 16% in Alabama; top 31% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 49.7 | 46.9 | 45.8 | bottom 43% in Alabama; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 31.6 | 39.5 | 42.9 | top 39% in Alabama; top 32% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.57, RN 0.71, weekend 3.81.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.57 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Arbor Springs Health and Rehab Center, LTD. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Partnership
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porter, Howard | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 50% | 02/27/2009 |
| Traylor, Jonathan | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 50% | 02/27/2009 |
| Max Credit Union | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2011 |
| Porter, Howard | Individual | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/27/2009 |
| Traylor Porter Health Care Management INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/27/2009 |
| Traylor Porter Health Care Management INC | Organization | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/10/2009 |
| Traylor, Jonathan | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/27/2009 |
| Traylor, Jonathan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2009 |
| Traylor, Jonathan | Individual | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/27/2009 |
All 9 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Traylor Porter Healthcare — 5 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arbor Lake Health and Rehab | 2.9 mi | Auburn, AL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Lafayette Extended Care | 17.4 mi | Lafayette, AL | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Lafayette Nursing Home | 17.6 mi | Lafayette, AL | ★★☆☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Eamc Lanier Nursing Home | 18.5 mi | Valley, AL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Diversicare of Lanett | 19.1 mi | Lanett, AL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 015192.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details