LouisianaFarmerville

Arbor Lake Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation

1155 Sterlington Highway, Farmerville, LA 71241 · Union County · 150 certified beds · avg 95 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1998

Part of chain: PARAMOUNT HEALTHCARE CONSULTANTS (14 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.90
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Oct 1, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Oct 1, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Oct 1, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Oct 1, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Oct 1, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 1, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Oct 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Oct 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Oct 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Oct 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Oct 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Oct 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Oct 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out.
Oct 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Oct 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Nov 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340E
202490E
202580E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityLouisiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.904.043.95bottom 46% in Louisiana; top 44% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.220.320.69bottom 32% in Louisiana; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.403.453.50bottom 48% in Louisiana; top 48% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.090.200.48bottom 11% in Louisiana; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)33.347.645.8top 13% in Louisiana; top 20% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.041.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.41, RN 0.19, weekend 2.97. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Dupree, DorisIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest11%12/06/2021
Joe Kenneth Newton Jr. QSST TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest6%08/19/2017
Kelly Delane Newton Zimmerer QSST TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest6%08/19/2017
Kristi Lynn Newton Owens QSST TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest6%08/19/2017
Myrick, FredIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest25%03/01/2010
Newton, LindaIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest8%03/01/2010
Redd, SharonIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest11%12/06/2021
Smith, DawneIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest17%03/01/2010
Vidrine, TeresaIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest11%12/06/2021
Beasley, WilliamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2019
Beasley, WilliamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2019
Dupree, DorisIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/06/2021
Joe Kenneth Newton Jr. QSST TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/19/2017
Kelly Delane Newton Zimmerer QSST TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/19/2017
Kristi Lynn Newton Owens QSST TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/19/2017
Lakeview Nursing Home INCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/19/2017
Lakeview Nursing Home INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/19/2017
Myrick, FredIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2010
Newton, LindaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2010
Paramount Healthcare Consultants, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Farmerville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC0.9 miFarmerville, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Onyx Care of Bernice15.3 miBernice, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Onyx Care of Ruston19.2 miRuston, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Farmerville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195459.