IllinoisWestchester

Aperion Care Westchester

2901 South Wolf Road, Westchester, IL 60154 · Cook County · 120 certified beds · avg 115 residents/day · certified since Nov 24, 1989

Part of chain: APERION CARE (33 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$53,141
Fines, last 3 years
2.14
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 25, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 26, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 28, 2024 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 1, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 3, 2023 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 11, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 15, 2023 · F-0684

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 30, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (36)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · from a complaint
Sep 24, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Jul 25, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 25, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Jul 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jul 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jul 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jul 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Jul 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jul 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Jul 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jul 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Jul 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jul 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Jul 25, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Jul 25, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Jul 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Oct 25, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Aug 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Aug 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jul 25, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Jul 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Jun 28, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Jun 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Jun 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 3, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
May 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Dec 3, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 15, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 16).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202322G ▲
2024132G ▲
2025180F
202630D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $53,141, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jun 28, 2024Fine$38,948
Jun 28, 2024Payment Denial8 days from Jul 18, 2024
Dec 3, 2023Fine$14,193

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIllinois avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.142.993.95bottom 14% in Illinois; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.470.630.69bottom 46% in Illinois; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing1.932.673.50bottom 15% in Illinois; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.520.560.48top 41% in Illinois; top 30% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)38.244.545.8top 33% in Illinois; top 32% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)22.241.842.9top 19% in Illinois; top 17% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.93, RN 0.65, weekend 2.65. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Joshua Hoffman TrustOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Ridgeview Investor Group LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest25%04/01/2021
Ytlm Equities, LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
2901 Wolf Road, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/31/2025
Aperion Care Exec Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Aperion Care INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Aperion Care INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Aperion Consulting, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Barajas-Moran, IlianaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Barajas-Moran, IlianaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Berkowitz, DavidIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/16/2025
Curis Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
David a Berkowitz Delta TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
David a Berkowitz Revoc Tr David Berkowitz TteeOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Geigel, KatherineIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Geigel, KatherineIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Hussain, JawwadIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Hussain, JawwadIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Meystel, YosefIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/16/2025
Nwakudu, UrsulaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Grove of Lagrange Park, the1.6 miLa Grange Park, IL★★★☆☆3/5
Plymouth Place2.0 miLa Grange Park, IL★★★★★5/5
Pearl of Hillside,the2.4 miHillside, IL★☆☆☆☆2/5
Bella Terra Lagrange2.5 miLa Grange, IL★★★★☆4/5
Pearl of Hinsdale, the2.7 miHinsdale, IL★★★★☆4/5
Meadowbrook Manor - Lagrange2.8 miLa Grange, IL★★☆☆☆2/5
Park Place Christian Community2.8 miElmhurst, IL★★★★★4/5
British Home, the3.1 miBrookfield, IL★★★☆☆2/5
Bella Terra Elmhurst3.2 miElmhurst, IL★★★★☆4/5
Oakwood Rehab and Nursing Center3.6 miWestmont, IL★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Alta Rehab at Oak Brook3.7 miOak Brook, IL★★☆☆☆2/5
Aperion Care Forest Park4.4 miForest Park, IL★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Westchester →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 145660.