ArkansasAlma

Alma Nursing and Rehab

401 Heather Lane, Alma, AR 72921 · Crawford County · 105 certified beds · avg 86 residents/day · certified since Jan 15, 2002

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS (38 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$26,195
Fines, last 3 years
4.86
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 10, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Apr 8, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (10)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 10, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Aug 22, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Aug 22, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 9, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 9, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jun 9, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 9, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Jun 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Jun 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (2 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202360F
202420E
202621J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $26,195.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 10, 2026Fine$26,195

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityArkansas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.864.713.95top 32% in Arkansas; top 16% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.480.480.69top 37% in Arkansas; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.084.043.50top 39% in Arkansas; top 20% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.360.280.48top 24% in Arkansas; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)50.549.545.8bottom 41% in Arkansas; bottom 36% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)37.544.842.9top 38% in Arkansas; top 42% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.43, RN 0.44, weekend 3.72. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Alma Estates LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/12/2024
Central Arkansas Nursing Centers INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
George-Fort, DebraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/10/2024
George-Fort, DebraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/20/2024
Morton, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/12/2024
Norsworthy, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025
Nursing Consultants INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Rana, JavedIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/10/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Van Buren Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center5.9 miVan Buren, AR★★★★★5/5
The Blossoms at Van Buren Rehab and Nursing Center7.1 miVan Buren, AR★☆☆☆☆1/5
Valley Springs Rehabilitation and Health Center7.8 miVan Buren, AR★★★★☆3/5
Legacy Health and Rehabilitation Center9.8 miFort Smith, AR★★☆☆☆2/5
Methodist Health and Rehab11.1 miFort Smith, AR★★★☆☆3/5
Chapel Ridge Health and Rehab12.0 miFort Smith, AR★★★★☆3/5
Ashton Place Health and Rehab, LLC12.2 miBarling, AR★★★★☆4/5
Covington Court Health and Rehabilitation Center13.8 miFort Smith, AR★★★★☆4/5
Riverside Health Services14.8 miArkoma, OK★☆☆☆☆2/5
The Blossoms at Fort Smith Rehab & Nursing Center15.5 miFort Smith, AR★☆☆☆☆2/5
Sequoyah East Nursing Center, LLC16.0 miRoland, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5
Brooken Hill Health and Rehab, LLC16.0 miFort Smith, AR★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Alma →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 045370.