How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Alhambra Hospital Med Ctr DP/SNF
100 S Raymond Ave, Alhambra, CA 91801 (opens Google Maps) · Los Angeles County · (626) 570-1606· 26 certified beds · avg 25 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 2008 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: AHMC HEALTHCARE (5 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jul 3, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.24
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 26 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. F-0693
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
View all 26 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Jul 3, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jul 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jul 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694 |
| Jul 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jul 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jul 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 30, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jun 30, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Jun 30, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Jun 30, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jun 30, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 30, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. · F-0887 |
| Jun 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Jun 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Jun 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jun 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jun 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Jun 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Jul 14, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Jul 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Jul 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Jul 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 8).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 13
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 13 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 8 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityCalifornia averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.24
California average: 4.31
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.12
California average: 0.61
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.08
California average: 3.90
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.24 | 4.31 | 3.95 | bottom 3% in California; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.12 | 0.61 | 0.69 | top 8% in California; top 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.08 | 3.90 | 3.50 | bottom 6% in California; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 2.27 | 0.51 | 0.48 | top 2% in California; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 29.5 | 36.7 | 45.8 | top 27% in California; top 13% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 38.9 | 38.1 | 42.9 | bottom 48% in California; top 45% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 7.39, RN 2.55, weekend 7.02.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (7.39 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Alhambra Hospital Med Ctr DP/SNF. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Partnership
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ahmc, INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 14% | 07/28/1998 |
| Liang, Amy Shlow- Yeh | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 06/30/1999 |
| Wu, Jonathan | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 30% | 04/30/2024 |
| Wu, Jonathan | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 14% | 07/28/1998 |
| Wu, Yi Kun | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 44% | 07/28/1998 |
| Ahmc, INC. | Organization | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/28/1998 |
| Chu, Shan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/27/2025 |
| Ku, Evelyn | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/24/2023 |
| Ku, Evelyn | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/24/2023 |
| Ku, Evelyn | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/28/2025 |
| Marsh, Linda | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/09/1989 |
All 11 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Ahmc Healthcare — 5 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Greater el Monte Community Hos — El Monte, CA · overall 4/5
- Royal Vista Care Center — San Gabriel, CA · overall 1/5
- San Gabriel Valley Medical Ctr D/P SNF — San Gabriel, CA · overall 4/5
- Ahmc Seton Medical Center — Daly City, CA · overall 1/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "Who on your staff manages IV therapy, and what training and monitoring is in place?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the California midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 30% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 296 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atherton Baptist Home | 0.6 mi | Alhambra, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Sunny Village Care Center | 0.9 mi | Alhambra, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Royal Gardens Healthcare | 1.1 mi | Alhambra, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Alhambra Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP | 1.1 mi | Alhambra, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Royal Vista Care Center | 1.8 mi | San Gabriel, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Live Oak Rehab Center | 1.9 mi | San Gabriel, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Heritage Manor | 1.9 mi | Monterey Park, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Ivy Creek Healthcare & Wellness Centre | 1.9 mi | San Gabriel, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| San Gabriel Valley Medical Ctr D/P SNF | 1.9 mi | San Gabriel, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Monterey Park Conv Hosp | 2.0 mi | Monterey Park, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| South Pasadena Care Center | 2.1 mi | South Pasadena, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Broadway Healthcare Center | 2.4 mi | San Gabriel, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Los Angeles, CA — 369 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- All Saints Healthcare Subacute — North Hollywood, CA · overall 2/5
- Alta View Post Acute — Los Angeles, CA · overall 1/5
- Alvarado Care Center — Los Angeles, CA · overall 2/5
- Angels Nursing Health Center — Los Angeles, CA · overall 5/5
- Antelope Valley Care Center — Lancaster, CA · overall 2/5SFF
- Ararat Convalescent Hospital — Los Angeles, CA · overall 4/5
- Ararat Nursing Facility — Mission Hills, CA · overall 1/5abuseSFF
- Ararat Post Acute — Glendale, CA · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555850.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).