York Manor Nursing Home

Name: York Manor Nursing Home
Address: 500 SOUTH YORK, Muskogee, OK, 74403, US
Telephone: 9186826724

500 South York, Muskogee, OK 74403 · Muskogee County · 60 certified beds · avg 39 residents/day · certified since Jan 20, 1993

1/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

5.20

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (41)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Sep 15, 2025	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Sep 15, 2025	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint
Sep 15, 2025	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 15, 2025	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Sep 15, 2025	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.
Sep 15, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Sep 15, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Sep 15, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Sep 15, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Sep 15, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Sep 15, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Sep 15, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Sep 15, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 15, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 15, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Sep 15, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 15, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
Sep 15, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Jan 29, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jan 29, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Jan 29, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 29, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Jan 29, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Jan 29, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 16, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Oct 16, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · from a complaint
Oct 16, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts. · from a complaint
Oct 16, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 16, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Oct 16, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Oct 16, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint
Oct 16, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Oct 16, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Oct 16, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Oct 16, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Oct 16, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from.
Oct 16, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Oct 16, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint
Oct 16, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · from a complaint
Oct 16, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Oct 16, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 18).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	17	0	F
2025	24	0	F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Oklahoma avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	5.20	4.58	3.95	top 19% in Oklahoma; top 10% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.50	0.41	0.69	top 25% in Oklahoma; bottom 37% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	5.49	4.16	3.50	top 4% in Oklahoma; top 3% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.24	0.28	0.48	bottom 44% in Oklahoma; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	69.4	55.5	45.8	bottom 16% in Oklahoma; bottom 6% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	0.0	53.6	42.9	—

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.21, RN 0.31, weekend 3.39. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Barton, Blaine	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	03/15/2023
Barton, Blaine	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	03/15/2023
Barton, Blaine	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	03/15/2023
Barton, Blaine	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/15/2023
Baucom, Kathy	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	03/15/2023
Baucom, Kathy	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	09/10/2010
Baucom, Kathy	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/20/2010
Blue, Randall	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	03/15/2023
Blue, Randall	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	03/15/2023
Blue, Randall	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	03/15/2023
Blue, Randall	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/15/2023
Blue, Randall	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/15/2023
Bokf,na	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/16/2021
Breashears, Shirley	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/16/2023
Breashears, Shirley	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/16/2023
Darby, Jan	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	02/05/2025
Darby, Jan	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	02/05/2025
Forvis Mazars LLP	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/09/2023
Forvis Mazars LLP	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/26/2025
Hermance, Terry	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Walk me through what happens when a resident or family files a grievance — who responds and how fast?"
"Where do you post your daily staffing numbers, and can I see today's?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"Who oversees antibiotic use here, and how do you decide when an antibiotic is really needed?"
"Who is your infection preventionist, and what training do they have?"
"How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
"How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
"Does a pharmacist review every resident's medications and chart monthly, and how are their concerns acted on?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Broadway Care & Rehab Center	0.7 mi	Muskogee, OK	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Pleasant Valley Health Care Center	0.7 mi	Muskogee, OK	★★★☆☆	3/5
Muskogee Nursing Center	1.0 mi	Muskogee, OK	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Eastgate Village Care & Rehab Center	1.2 mi	Muskogee, OK	★★☆☆☆	3/5
Brentwood Extended Care & Rehab	4.2 mi	Muskogee, OK	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
The Springs Skilled Nursing and Therapy	5.5 mi	Muskogee, OK	★★★☆☆	3/5
Fort Gibson Care & Rehab Center	6.7 mi	Fort Gibson, OK	★★★☆☆	3/5
Wagoner Health & Rehab	15.8 mi	Wagoner, OK	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Countryside Estates	17.3 mi	Warner, OK	★★★☆☆	4/5
Community Health Care of Gore	19.1 mi	Gore, OK	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuseSFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Muskogee →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375132.

The Care File

Visit checklist — York Manor Nursing Home

500 South York, Muskogee, OK 74403 · 9186826724

Health inspection rating 1/5 · CMS overall 1/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Walk me through what happens when a resident or family files a grievance — who responds and how fast?"
☐ "Where do you post your daily staffing numbers, and can I see today's?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "Who oversees antibiotic use here, and how do you decide when an antibiotic is really needed?"
☐ "Who is your infection preventionist, and what training do they have?"
☐ "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
☐ "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
☐ "Does a pharmacist review every resident's medications and chart monthly, and how are their concerns acted on?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 375132 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)