Wyatt Manor Nursing and Rehab Ctr, INC
4659 Highway 505, Jonesboro, LA 71251 · Jackson County · 62 certified beds · avg 50 residents/day · certified since Jan 15, 2003
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Sep 24, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 28, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Oct 7, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)
All citations in the current public record (11)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Mar 4, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Sep 24, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Jan 8, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. |
| Jan 8, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Oct 28, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Jan 31, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 2).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 7 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
2 fines totaling $17,275.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2025 | Fine | $8,281 |
| Oct 28, 2024 | Fine | $8,994 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Louisiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.02 | 4.04 | 3.95 | top 10% in Louisiana; top 13% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.39 | 0.32 | 0.69 | top 17% in Louisiana; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.70 | 3.45 | 3.50 | top 5% in Louisiana; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.48 | top 29% in Louisiana; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 46.3 | 47.6 | 45.8 | top 49% in Louisiana; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 0.0 | 41.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.69, RN 0.29, weekend 3.45. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harper, Charlotte | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 14% | 01/01/2004 |
| Meyers, Mark | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 12/31/2013 |
| Tucker, Dixie | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 12/31/2013 |
| Zimmerman, Freda | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 57% | 01/09/1968 |
| Bolwahnn, Sheila | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2008 |
| Cantrell, Jeffrey Lee | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2013 |
| Central Management Company, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2005 |
| Central Management Company, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/02/2025 |
| Harper, Charlotte | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2004 |
| Meyers, Mark | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2013 |
| Price, Teddy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Price, Teddy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Rogers, Dawn | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/1993 |
| Shelton, James | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/23/1990 |
| Tucker, Dixie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2013 |
| Zimmerman, Freda | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/09/1968 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "What is your policy on physical restraints, and what alternatives do you try first?"
- "What is your approach to psychiatric medications — how do you try non-drug options first and work to reduce doses over time?"
- "How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forest Haven Nursing & Rehab Ctr, LLC | 5.1 mi | Jonesboro, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Onyx Care of Winnfield | 15.8 mi | Winnfield, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Autumn Leaves Nursing & Rehab Center, LLC | 16.8 mi | Winnfield, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Alpine Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation | 18.2 mi | Ruston, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195568.