MarylandChestertown

Willow Brooke Ct Skilled Care Ctr at Heron Point

501 Campus Avenue, Chestertown, MD 21620 · Kent County · 38 certified beds · avg 2 residents/day · certified since Nov 7, 1991

Part of chain: ACTS RETIREMENT-LIFE COMMUNITIES (27 facilities, chain avg rating 4.7★)

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$15,440
Fines, last 3 years
5.91
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 23, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jul 13, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 11, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 23, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Feb 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Feb 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Feb 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Feb 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Feb 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Feb 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Feb 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · from a complaint
Apr 9, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Apr 9, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
Apr 9, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Apr 9, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 9, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life.
Apr 9, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Apr 9, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role.
Apr 9, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Apr 9, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Apr 9, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Apr 9, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 9, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Apr 9, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Apr 9, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.
Apr 9, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 1).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2019150E
2024101J ▲
202510F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $15,440.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 23, 2024Fine$15,440

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMaryland avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.913.833.95top 4% in Maryland; top 4% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours2.190.830.69top 3% in Maryland; top 1% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.133.433.50top 6% in Maryland; top 5% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.200.630.48top 6% in Maryland; top 4% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.040.245.8
RN turnover (%)0.038.742.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.75, RN 1.76, weekend 4.12. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: —/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Acts Acquisition and Development Company LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2022
Acts Alliance Management LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2022
Acts Legacy Foundation, INC.OrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2022
Acts Retirement Services, INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2022
Acts Signature Community Services INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2022
Bonita Springs Retirement Village INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Mease Life INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Acts Communities of Maryland, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2022
Acts Communities of Maryland, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2022
Acts Management Services, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2022
Acts Management Services, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/06/2025
Acts Retirement-Life Communities Management, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2022
Acts Retirement-Life Communities Management, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/06/2025
Ahern, SusanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2022
Ahern, SusanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2022
Ahern, SusanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Baker Tilly Advisory Group LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/03/2025
Baker Tilly Us LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/05/2024
Christiansen, KarenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2022
Christiansen, KarenIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Chestertown Nursing and Rehab0.5 miChestertown, MD★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Resorts at Chester River Manor Corp0.6 miChestertown, MD★★★☆☆3/5
Complete Care at Corsica Hills LLC11.6 miCentreville, MD★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Chestertown →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215235.