TennesseePleasant Hill

Wharton Nursing Home

878-880 West Main Street, Pleasant Hill, TN 38578 · Cumberland County · 62 certified beds · avg 60 residents/day · certified since Sep 19, 2012

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$69,885
Fines, last 3 years
4.35
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 24, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 25, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 24, 2024 · F-0609 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.

Why it matters: When incidents aren't reported promptly, abusers may continue harming residents and outside authorities can't step in.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 25, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 24, 2024 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 25, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 22, 2024 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 4, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 24, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
May 24, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
May 24, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Feb 22, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 22, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Feb 22, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Feb 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 30, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jun 30, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jun 30, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 12, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
Feb 12, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Feb 12, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Feb 12, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Feb 12, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Feb 12, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Feb 12, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201970D
202130D
202484J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $69,885.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 24, 2024Fine$30,722
Feb 22, 2024Fine$39,163

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTennessee avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.353.623.95top 14% in Tennessee; top 27% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.460.570.69bottom 40% in Tennessee; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.873.153.50top 13% in Tennessee; top 27% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.280.390.48bottom 35% in Tennessee; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.048.945.8
RN turnover (%)0.043.242.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.20, RN 0.44, weekend 3.74. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Uplands VillageOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest06/29/2012
Chitiyo, GeorgeIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/26/2020
Clemow, DerrickIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/25/2020
Everett, BarbaraIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/27/2016
Hanson, HollyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/25/2017
Mitchell, TomIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/24/2018
Murner, HerschelIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2017
Murner, HerschelIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2017
Murner, HerschelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2017
Murner, HerschelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2017
Murner, HerschelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2017
Overlock, MarcIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/19/2018
Peeples, SusanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/19/2018
Smith, BarbaraIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/17/2019
Smith, CynthiaIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2017
Smith, CynthiaIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2017

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Life Care Center of Crossville9.6 miCrossville, TN★★★★☆3/5
Wyndridge Health and Rehab Ctr10.1 miCrossville, TN★★☆☆☆3/5
Standing Stone Care and Rehab12.6 miMonterey, TN★★★★★5/5
NHC Healthcare, Sparta14.9 miSparta, TN★★★☆☆3/5
Life Care Center of Sparta16.0 miSparta, TN★★★★★5/5
Grandview Post Acute19.4 miCookeville, TN★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Preserve at Fairfield Glade19.7 miCrossville, TN★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Pleasant Hill →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 445510.